The Difference Between the Tea Party and the GOP Establishment

September 16, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

Reason magazine’s Matt Welch asks a good question: What did Delaware’s GOP Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell actually run on?

In a campaign that was long on anti-establishment, I’m-no-RINO pique, and short on policy specifics, Welch concludes that O’Donnell mostly emphasized that she’s “staunchly anti-earmark, anti-TARP, anti-Obamacare, and anti-cap-and-trade.”

All right.

Let’s stipulate that in a campaign against an inveterately squishy Republican like Rep. Mike Castle, there’s appreciable daylight between him and an “authentic conservative” like O’Donnell. But with the exception of TARP, congressional Republicans are right in step with O’Donnell. If she makes it to Washington, she will find few GOPers to her left.

Clearly, something else is going on here. What is it about the so-called establishment that so aggravates the Tea Party right?

We’ve all heard the obvious answers: that establishment Republicans aren’t serious about curbing spending, that they’re concerned foremost with the perpetuation of their own power, that they’re far too cushy with big business and special interest lobbyists.

[Read more about the deficit and national debt.]

On his radio show yesterday, Rush Limbaugh charged that Republicans in Washington have marinated too long in a city that “socially and politically is controlled by liberal Democrats”--and anyone who worries about securing “relevance” in this self-dealing scene is fatally compromised.

There’s no doubt some truth to this. Like Hollywood, Washington is indeed a kind of mill town.

But my sense, after living here for the last 12 years, is that the primary difference between the Republican “base” and the establishment is this: The base believes Washington has created “this mess”--i.e., the growing size of government and the debt that finances it--and the establishment, though it does not like to say so publicly, realizes that “this mess” has been broadly ratified by the public for decades.

Remember Tom DeLay’s remarks in 2005 about fat in the federal budget--“after 11 years of Republican majority we’ve pared it down pretty good”? DeLay perhaps felt honest making this shocking statement because, in its annual appropriations process, Congress has control only over discretionary programs. The big money--Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid--is on autopilot. The fat that Congress actually controls is more like gristle.

Rep. Paul Ryan, who has ably and honestly positioned himself as a bridge between the establishment and the base, comes close to admitting the truth in his response to New York Times columnist David Brooks: “The explosion in government spending and overreach has been a bipartisan failure, not for years but for decades. Politicians continued to make promises that simply cannot be kept.”

Correct. But Ryan tiptoes around the elephant in the room: Politicians made promises to whom? Russians? Europeans? Martians? Venusians?

[See who supports Ryan.]

The Wall Street Journal noted in a front-page story yesterday:

Efforts to tame America's ballooning budget deficit could soon confront a daunting reality: Nearly half of all Americans live in a household in which someone receives government benefits, more than at any time in history. ...

Yet even as Americans express concern over the deficit in opinion polls, many oppose benefit cuts, particularly with the economy on an uneven footing. A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll conducted late last month found 61 percent of voters were "enthusiastic" or "comfortable" with congressional candidates who support cutting federal spending in general. But 56 percent expressed the same enthusiasm for candidates who voted to extend unemployment benefits.

This is fundamentally why I refuse to take the Tea Party-Glenn Beck-Sarah Palin-O’Donnell brigade seriously: They rail at distant, indifferent Washington, but consider themselves and their like blameless and incorruptible.

The truth is, we’ve all created “this mess,” and it’s going to take cooperation and cool heads to fix it.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Tea Party,
Mike Castle,
Glenn Beck,
Paul Ryan,
energy policy and climate change,
Congress,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
healthcare,
healthcare reform,
Sarah Palin,
Christine O'Donnell

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Bill Hedges has repeatedly blamed Clinton for everything except for the scourge of hemorrhoids. Yet you only began with the self righteous lectures when I responded. Interesting.

steve of IL 2:24PM September 18, 2010

It's Indian summer here in Idaho. The nights are cold and crisp and the days are warm. The other morning, my 11 yr old daughter prepared to leave the house to catch the bus to school. It was cold that morning and I repeatedly told her to wear a coat. I even put her coat with her lunch and homework. And, as you can well imagine, she left without it. Consequently she was cold and came home from school upset. Then she had the audacity to blame ME for her failure to wear a coat. She blamed the school for having to catch the bus so far from the home and so early in the morning. She blamed the bus driver because she perceive that he had been a few minutes late. She blamed me for building our home so far from the bus stop. She even blamed my wife for not making the sacrifice to drive her to the bus stop in a warm car. In short, she blamed everyone but herself. Then, worse than that, I learned (when her littel sister tattled on her), that she had tried to convince her little sister to give-up her coat.

Here is the point. The problems we have are not Bush's fault, Obama's fault, Clinton's fault, George Washington's fault. We want to blame everyone but ourselves for our problems. Sure our leaders make macro level decisions that can and do effect us. But ultimately, at the end of the day, it's our problem, not theirs. We (collectively) have to grow up, be adults and not behave like spoiled children. We have to tighten our belts, straighten our backs, roll up our sleeves, set our jaws, make changes and get to work. Sure it's hard, humiliating, humbling to go from an exalted titled position to a fry cook flipping burgers. Life is not about getting to an exalted position and life is not fair. Oh well. The point is, DO something about it. Don't whine and complain, and demand entitlements. Don't blame everyone. And, don't make it worse by trying to take someone else's coat because you forgot to wear yours.

david of ID 12:21PM September 17, 2010

It also makes more sense to blame Bush for the current crisis than it does to blame Obama. When Bush came into office unemployment was 4%; when he left it was nearing 8%. Bush doubled the national debt without making a single net private sector job!! He left a $1.4 trillion deficit for fiscal '09 and there was a net decline in federal income tax revenues in inflation adjusted terms between 2001 and 2008. Bush was a disaster and we'll be paying for his illegal war in Iraq for years!!

The main cause of the recession is lost output and tax base from the deep recession which began in the last quarter of 2007. It isn't the discretionary spending, which Boehner and the GOP makes such an issue about, that is creating the deficits but the non-discretionary spending which increases as automatic stabilizers react to the effects of the recession. According to the a recent study by the Levy Institute of Bard College;

"In a report and accompanying dataset released in January,

the CBO (2010a) estimates that the recent recession and shaky

recovery contributed 2 percentage points to the total 2009 federal

deficit of 9.3 percent of potential GDP. As an estimate of the

budgetary impact of the weak economy, this number is on the

low side because neither the stimulus plan nor other recession related but discretionary spending is included. On the other hand, according to the CBO, stimulus bill spending for 2009 amounted to only seven-tenths of a percent of GDP (CBO 2010a, p. 96). By the CBO’s definition, discretionary spending (often thought of by conservatives as the big problem) increased by only 1.2 percent of GDP from 2007 to 2009. By contrast, “mandatory expenditures” (those required by Social Security rules, welfare eligibility rules, et cetera) increased by 4.5 percent of GDP. Means-tested benefit programs—a category that includes the program formerly known as food stamps, as well as unemployment benefits and supplemental security income (SSI)—grew by 72 percent in nominal terms between 2007 and 2009. Of course, this trend can be blamed mostly on the recession and financial crisis, and the government’s response to these events."

http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/ppb_114.pdf

Boehner, of course, blames non-defense related discretionary spending which is not nearly as culpable as the automatic stabilizers and the lost tax base from the current downturn. According to the very same report;

"Meanwhile, tax revenues fell from 18.5 percent to 14.8 percent

of national output in that period. Once Congress sets tax

policy, it is the strength of the economy that determines tax revenues. The stimulus bill accounts for 0.6 percentage points of

this 3.7 percentage-point decline. The point of stating these facts

is not to claim that the budget deficit is unrelated to recent political decisions, but to make it clear that America’s current fiscal stance is part and parcel of the recession and financial crisis, and not the product of political whims."

steve of IL 11:56AM September 17, 2010

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement