The Rise and Rise of the Middle Class

July 2, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (43)

Rod Dreher links to a depressing post by author-blogger John Robb, who predicts that America’s (and Europe’s) middle class “is soon to become a fond memory.”

Writes Robb:

The social contract that enabled this success, particularly the post-WW2 social contract that shared the increases in wealth generated by improvements in productivity with the more productive workers that enabled it, ended with the financialization of economic activity and globalization (and governments that facilitated and catalyzed the process). In sum, the increase in wealth the western middle class produced over the last three decades has been transferred to global financial elites (who misspent it) and mercantilist nations (China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, etc.).

This analysis strikes me as problematic for a number of reasons. First, as this Drew Carey video commentary amusingly demonstrates, middle-class Americans, until the recession, were awash in cheap consumer goods, and could afford a standard of living far beyond the dreams of 1950s postwar suburbanites.

Second, I’m not sure it’s as accurate to say that the wealth created by the “financialization of economic activity and globalization” was transferred to elites, only subsequently to be misspent, as it is to say that much of that wealth was vaporous in the first place.

Finally, I think Robb is more right than he thinks when he says that the middle class is an “exceptional feature of modern Western history.” Yes: It was exceptional in large part because the conditions from which it emerged were exceptional. Namely: a global war that left Europe and Japan in rubble but America intact, plus an enormous economic boom that resulted from pent-up postwar consumer demand. This boom, and America’s lack of global competitors, enabled companies to strike extraordinarily generous bargains with labor unions.

The rise of India, China, and parts of Latin America is, broadly speaking, not simply the result of menacing “mercantilism,” as Robb believes. There are literally billions of people who don’t live in the West, see how it lives, and think to themselves: “I’m as smart as they are. I can do that job. Why can’t I have those toys?” Increasingly we’re finding out that they can. (Although, in the case of China, where domestic consumption is suppressed, citizens there should be asking that question of their own government.)

The Western middle class is not disappearing. It is struggling to compete with the emergence of other, non-Western middle classes--and that’s not necessarily something we should lament.

Tags:
World War II,
economy,
global economy

Reader Comments Read all comments (43)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Had we passed EFCA all this would have been a moot point. But no. It's far better that we have a level of economic inequality in this country that follows that pattern of a regressive third world country instead of a highly developed democracy. Doesn't a incredibly skewed distribution of income make you so proud to be an American?

steve of IL 5:04PM July 12, 2010

Each of those practices that you allege to have happened are blatantly illegal, yet the unions involved didn't file grievances with the federal authorities?

Makes you wonder just how real those alleged practices actually are.

Unions making things up??? Na, they would never get that dishonest!!! (rolleyes)

In either case, not allowing secret ballot voting is simply wrong and open to massive abuse by the unions.

junior of DC 8:22PM July 09, 2010

By the time a certification election comes around everyone knows how everyone else is going to vote mostly because of the bosses intimidation campaign. They hold private meetings with workers and threaten to close the business if they vote a union in and other scare tactics. This has been documented by the NLRB.

A study by Kate Bronfenbrenner of the Economic Policy Institute surveys employer reactions to NLRB elections to certify unions in a large number of cases between 1999 and 2003. The study is called No Holds Barred: The Intensification of Employer Opposition to Organizing. It was published in 2009.

One of the findings was that, “one-third of employers fire workers for union activity during NLRB certification campaigns.”

This study covered five years from 1/1/99 to 12/31/03. It involved a thorough survey of primary NLRB documents concerning a random sample of 1,004 NLRB certification elections during this time and a survey of 562 union certification campaigns conducted with that same sample. Some further key findings were:

“…employers threatened to close the plant in 57% of elections, discharged workers in 34%, and threatened to cut wages and benefits in 47% of elections. Workers were forced to attend anti-union one-on-one sessions with a supervisor at least weekly in two-thirds of elections. In 63% of elections employers used supervisor one-on-one meetings to interrogate workers about who they or other workers supported, and in 54% used such sessions to threaten workers.”

One of Bronfenbrenner’s most telling and interesting conclusions was that;

…[A] combination of threats, interrogation, surveillance, and harassment has ensured that there is no such thing as a democratic “secret ballot” in the NLRB certification election process. The progression of actions the employer has taken can ensure that the employer knows exactly which way every worker plans to vote long before the election takes place. In fact, as our data show, many of the employer campaigns were in full swing more than a month before the petition was even filed. Although most of these actions are illegal, the penalties are minimal…”

Here is the link:

http://epi.3cdn.net/edc3b3dc172dd1094f_0ym6ii96d.pdf

This is the reason to support EFCA. It would eliminate these problems.

steve of IL 7:01PM July 09, 2010

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement