Louis Armstrong, Not Michael Jackson, Broke the Pop Color Barrier

June 24, 2010 RSS Feed Print

If anyone was under the mistaken impression that I’m above rank self-promotion, here’s my review for The American Conservative of Terry Teachout’s wonderful biography, Pops: A Life of Louis Armstrong, just now available to nonsubscribers.

And, since tomorrow marks the first anniversary of Michael Jackson’s death, I thought this bit was worth highlighting:

With an absurdly foreshortened frame of historical reference, the Rev. Al Sharpton said in the wake of that other King of Pop’s death, “Michael Jackson made culture accept a person of color, way before Tiger Woods, way before Oprah Winfrey, way before Barack Obama. Michael did with music what they later did in sports, and in politics, and in television.”

Come again?

Decades before Thriller, Louis Armstrong was co-starring and crooning with Bing Crosby and, in 1949, made the cover of Time, a recognition that, Teachout hastens to remind the reader, “carried far more weight in the forties than it does today.”

A year later, I’m still mystified that Jackson is thought of as breaking the color barrier in pop music. (Here, from CNN, is just one of many such assertions from a particularly overeducated fan.)

The reason people forget that pre-Motown black artists were participants of mainstream American pop culture, even as they were personally subject to horrendous bigotry, is more or less the result of the way the Beatles changed the face of the industry—but without making any headway among black Americans and failing to introduce anything in the way of new dance rhythms, which, since the ragtime era, is where one typically located the pulse of pop music trends.

As the music historian Elijah Wald notes in his book, How the Beatles Destroyed Rock ’n’ Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music, the Beatles—through no fault of their own—ended up “re-segregating” Billboard’s pop charts, which by 1963 had absorbed the once-separate R&B chart.

This was the state of the industry from which Michael Jackson exploded.

But it hadn't always been thus.

Tags:
Oprah Winfrey,
Tiger Woods,
Michael Jackson,
Barack Obama,
music

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

They both have influenced one way or another, only Michael had more exposure to the world so the effect was greater.

Ron Vaisman 5:39PM October 21, 2010

I think the lesson here is that victories in social justice are rarely won once and for all - they have to be re fought and won again. Each of these artists came out of different times, different cultural circumstances. Michael Jackson was always honoring his predecessors and I'll bet he admired Louis Armstrong.

Diana of CA 2:25AM August 12, 2010

Mr.Armstrong is always going to be no.1 in this categourie because he did it first not to mention he did it with class & quite diginity where as the self proclaimed king of pop had that door out of the way by the time he did the same thing 20+ years.The only thing MJ was better at then Louis was making an ass of himself & child gropering need I say more.

cliff buelter of WA 5:42PM July 15, 2010

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement