Why the Sestak Job Offer Is a Big Deal

May 27, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Scott Galupo, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

In Washington, you can safely assume the air is beginning to stink when administration apologists play the “Politics isn’t a crime” card, as the Washington Monthly’s Steve Benen has here in reference to the brewing Joe Sestak job-offer scandal. [See who supports Sestak.]

Funny, I don’t remember Democrats being in such a forgiving mood when the Bush White House was accused of politicizing the Justice Department by firing a batch of U.S. Attorneys. Or when Rep. Tom DeLay launched his notorious K Street Project and helped to favorably redraw Texas’ congressional district boundaries. These efforts went beyond the pale of “exert[ing] influence in developments related to [the president’s] political party.” (Which indeed they did.)

One of my favorite liberal bloggers, Jonathan Chait, also seems to have succumbed to a sort of our-side-of-the-cafeteria partiality:

There's no such thing as offering somebody a job in return for them dropping out of a Senate race. The acceptance of a job means dropping out of a Senate race. The concept of offering somebody a job "in exchange" for them declining to seek another job is like offering to marry a woman in exchange for her not marrying some other guy. It's conceptually nonsensical.

Come again? Splitting hairs Michael Kinsley-style, Chait has out-thunk himself here.

We’re talking (possibly) about a simple clear-cut case of quid pro quo: “Do this and I’ll do that.” Or if Chait prefers, “Don’t marry him; marry me.” What’s so “nonsensical” about that? In fact, I think I’ve seen the movie a couple of dozen times. Is Chait saying that a bribe is illegal only if it's accepted?

[See the Top 10 Political Scandals of 2009]

Former Attorney General Mike Mukasey spun a couple of scenarios—one indictable, the other not so much—to Washington Post blogger Dave Weigel:

“The least bad case," Mukasey said, "is that the guy's 20 points down, and everybody says you don't want to do this and bloody up a candidate to no end. You want to do something, we can find something for you. But to call somebody in and tell them, 'Look, you bow out and we'll offer you a job' is very serious. No rational prosecutor should indict unless it's that blatant.’"

Sorry, Democrats. This is more than Fox News Channel-generated hysteria.

Corrected on 5/27/10: An earlier version of this blog post incorrectly spelled out-thunk.

Tags:
Joe Sestak,
Tom DeLay,
2010 election,
Senate,
Congress,
democratic party,
George W. Bush

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If we are going to allow unlimited illegals to come here then we will need are guns for protection. Those that live on the border would tell you that without a gun there lives would be worth little. Maybe you should live awhile in their shoes and see what it is all about.

Doc of AZ 12:19PM May 29, 2010

and says bribery is OK with him.

Probably Not of PA 5:49PM May 28, 2010

Yes, there's probably something to what Galupo says. If it's scandal, Washington's the place. And it's time voters got very tired of politics as usual for reasons other than their wallets.

I'm one of those who's happy Tea Party folks are managing to unseat a few fat cats in our nation's headquarters for shennanigans. Any progress is welcome. What worries me is that their reasoning is so limited, their constitutional rights and their money being threatened the impetus for action. Too much that is important is being missed in the process, and the end result of the action will not have much effect on the deep and dark problems in American politics.

Where is the outrage that sitting senators and representatives have been the reason that nothing successful has been done, in decades of possibilities, really to "win" the war of drugs, now a problem shared with Mexico thanks to our continuing as the big market for drugs and as the big supplier of guns for the bloody slaughter south of the border.

Where, after legislation passed in 1986, has the followup management or passage of better legislation been on the illegal immigration problem, now a national calamity affecting health care, national security, and other areas? How many sitting senators and represntatives have been in office through most of those more than 20 years?

And where is the outrage over deaths by shooting in this country? Guns have been an accident or an intention waiting to happen in the U.S. for many years now (and we are major exporters to other countries too) without any clear attempt at solution. Meanwhile, our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are abridged by the right to gun ownership exercised by comparatively few. Fair? Whatever you think, thank those long-sitting senators and representatives for taking care of America for us.

There's more, as you know, but my point should be clear. Folks like Senator Bob Bennett (R, UT) have found out that the wrath of voters, well organized voters in his case, can be fearsome. Why is the wrath a kind of selfish wrath, though, focused on overtaxation and personal rights, when long-standing national problems now in crisis stage could well be involved? Look how long the ballooning of health coverage costs, now twice per person in the U.S. than anywhere else, were let go before action--totally inadequate and lobbyist-shaped--was taken. I started following that problem 25 years ago and watched sitting senator and representaive do nothing much for years and years. And the lobbyists problem in health care is a symptom, too, of the money in politics one, long out of control and in need of attention by sitting senators and representatives who have successfully ignored it (with the help of lobbyist monetary persuasion).

Yes, it's time voters were unhappy with politics as usual, outraged enough to actually do something to clean up politics by voting ALL too-long-sitting rascals out.

Ron W. Smith of UT 1:34PM May 28, 2010

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement