New Jersey Education Fight Shows Union Pettiness

April 22, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

By Scott Galupo, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Back in my days as a staffer involved in selling the No Child Left Behind bill to a skeptical Republican caucus, we had to penetrate brick walls of boilerplate—especially the idea that education is the exclusive province of states and local districts.

This is descriptively true. Most education spending is sub-federal, and it will likely remain that way for good. But as an ideal, it shouldn’t be the end of the story. Other nonpartisan ideals—sunlight, empiricism, accountability—are just as important.

One need only look at the New Jersey Education Association’s furious opposition to Gov. Chris Christie’s pay-freeze proposal to see that fears of “nationalization” miss the point when it comes to education. State and local bureaucracies are every bit as entrenched and self-serving locally as they are in Washington. And as George Will wrote in 1991: “[L]ocalism makes less and less sense in a nation of increasing mobility among regions, a nation flunking—as a nation—the international test of competitiveness.”

Christie faces a teachers union balking at proposals that they take a temporary pay freeze and contribute a portion of their salary toward their health benefits (only 12 percent of teachers pay health insurance premiums, according to the Newark Star-Ledger). And the union shrouds its self-interest in the cloak of "the children."

Hope and change? Yup. The hard way.

 

Tags:
No Child Left Behind,
teachers

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Before asking teachers to take a pay freeze, how about getting gov. reps to take a pay freeze and decrease their outlandish lifetime pensions?

Maureen of MA 11:36AM August 03, 2010

Its about time a Gov, from any state would stand up to the special interest. Christie was being fair to all they didnt except so when some get laid off thank your union leaders. They even wanted to raise dues to a level equal to the amount they would not recieve to file suite. Not very inteligent for Educated people.

They pay nothing towards thier helth insurance. They nweed to let the ones go who are not performing. The day of Unions has come to and end and in most cases is just unnecassary as labor laws have become more stringent. What was needed 1930 is not needed today.

jerry of NY 11:04AM July 15, 2010

Galupo's post on N.J. teachers' unions is a bit too brief to be helpful. How can we judge if the unions are right or wrong in opposing a pay freeze and making voluntary contributions to health care insurance until we know such things as:

1. Class sizes and overall teacher class and student loads,

2. The pay scales of teachers who are in unions,

3. Teacher ratings and success with moving students along

to the next level without problems that indicate

students' lack of preparation.

4. Working conditions (inner city, school buildings,

teacher aids, classroom and school equipment.

I, too, am suspicious that unions can be obstacles, therefore in New Jersey, too, maybe. However, I'm also well aware the unions are unnecessary when salaries, conditions, and work hours are satisfactory. Are the NJ unions necessary because of inadequacies in those areas or are they JUST entrenched? (The latter should be tested against unions in professional sports to be fair, no?)

Because teachers take it on the chin regularly for the failures of parents, school support, student preparedness, and the like, I'm loath to judge when teachers are asked to sacrifice more than they do every day just by being teachers.

Help, Galupo! Give us more to work with.

Ron W. Smith of UT 3:40PM April 23, 2010

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement