Newt Gingrich: Republicans Won 1995 Government Shutdown

April 13, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (16)

By Scott Galupo, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Argh! What’s that awful sound I’m hearing? So familiar, so grating, so egomaniacal, so ... Newt.

According to Dave Weigel’s fine new blog at the Washington Post, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich bridled at the suggestion that the 1995 budget showdown between the congressional Republican majorities and President Clinton redounded in the favor the Democratic party.

“Wait a second,” said Gingrich. “This is the standard, elite, inside-the-Beltway worldview. Tell me in what way we didn’t win. After that, we got to a balanced budget. And what happened to the Republican majority?” The answer, of course, is that Republicans held the majority in 1996, while President Bill Clinton was reelected.

They’re too young to remember it directly, but Ross Douthat and Reihan Salam, in their book Grand New Party: How Republicans Can Win the Working Class and Save the American Dream, get it right:

After the disastrous government showdown gambit, the Republicans lost all the battleground states in the Dole-Clinton presidential race and began to shed congressional seats in the Rust Belt and the Pacific Northwest, where white working-class supermajorities had been crucial to Reaganite and Gingrichian success...

“Then,” Douthat and Salam write, “came the impeachment debacle.”

And how.

I don’t care how smart he was (is). Newt Gingrich helped run his party into the ground. Why anyone still listens to him is an impenetrable mystery.

Tags:
Newt Gingrich

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

And now Democrats claim Bill Clinton balanced the budget and brag about it. Isn't that funny

Dennis Brown of NJ 12:33AM February 24, 2013

This is again a classic example of the beltway thought process. Gingrich didn't care if he Clinton got re-elected, although Republicans did continue to pick up seats in 96 and 98, he didn't run for politics for political gain. His point was that, at the end of the day, he forced Clinton to balance the budgets, cut taxes, and reform welfare. He never cared what the political consequences were, all he cared about were the effects on government policy.

And in that sense, Republicans won because they did what they came to Washington to do instead of compromising their integrity like any beltway insider like yourself would have advised him to do.

Steve of NJ 1:37PM May 03, 2010

You've misread or have me confussed with Mitchell,Please God don't do that.I have NEVER and will never use "lil Bush",thats saved for the left.

Hunter of WI 8:44PM April 14, 2010

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement