Sam Dealey

Fox News and Media Bias

November 12, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Comment (19)
Tweet

In a gloating, open letter to Roger Ailes today, Harold Meyerson, a liberal columnist for the Washington Post, thanks the president of Fox News for the network's "consistent misrepresentation of the news." In Meyerson's view, the "right-wing fantasies" peddled by Fox News are so laughable that they have rolled back conservatism.

Now, I'm not a particular fan of U.S. television news—Fox News included. For the most part, the industry caters to the lowest common denominator, emphasizing tabloid, shallow reporting and anchor star-making rather than hard for-your-own-good news. Far better is the European model, exemplified by the Beeb, al Jazeera International, Euro News, and Sky.

I won't defend Fox News; its reporting is far from faultless. But if Meyerson is so opposed to the network, he might ask himself why it has dominated cable news virtually since its inception. Not surprisingly, it's because Fox News benefits from the very phenomenon Meyerson chides it for: misrepresentation and bias in the media.

The mainstream news media (for lack of a better term) consistently misreport news stories every day. And it's not just a fact or figure here and there but a deep bias in the way the media approach stories.

As just one example, consider taxation, the hottest topic in the last election. How many times did networks report that proposed tax cuts would "cost" so-and-so dollars? Why is static scoring the sole impact measurement, when there is considerable evidence supporting the greater accuracy of dynamic scoring? How many MSM reporters even know who Arthur Laffer is?

This negligence is just as ill-informed or biased as liberals would label Fox News reporting, and Meyerson's snarky piece is typical of the American model's shallow hype over substance.

Click here to read more by Sam Dealey.
Click here to read more about the media.

Tags:: Washington Post,; Fox News,; Fox Broadcasting Co.,; media,; television,; journalism

« Previous Post Next Post »

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts Comment Name State Email

Please enter the two words below into the text field underneath the image.

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

By the way, Newsvine never activated my account or published my posts either and I assure you they were not mistaken for right wing diatribes. I think their just slow on the uptake.

Craig B. Olds of WA 12:27AM March 24, 2010

There may be some intrinsic bias in the mainstream media, in fact I am sure there is. Generally I think it comes from the fact that big media outlets have parent companies that have axes to grind. GE owns MSNBC- they may make some coin marketing some of their news programing to the left but they still fawn over Ronald Reagan, they still trot out Joe Scarborough and they still choose what gets covered. Little comparative examination of our health care system in relation to health care in other wealthy nations was seen on MSNBC or any other mainstream media. The money just was not behind it.
FOX may be symptomatic of a media system driven by profit and not by substance but it is still worth pointing out, over and over again if necessary that this very popular media outlet is not only not fair or balanced but can hardly be called news at all, so blatant is it's political stance. It is an irresponsible use of the airwaves to wield that kind of power with no allegiance to the truth and the only reasonable answer to it is for other media outlets, like the Washington Post, to call FOX out on it.

Craig B. Olds of WA 12:21AM March 24, 2010

I blog on most of the mass media blogs, including the web, television and some radio. CNN is getting worse than they used to be and sometimes Fox is slanted and CBC and ABC are slanted too but the absolute worst in MSNBC, NBC, and Newsvine. Newsvine is a joke I registered and then posted comments on Newsvine twice. My account was then left in limbo. I contacted them twice to activate my account but no response from them. I then went on the web and found that hundreds of other people who submitted comments (which Newsvine did not agree with) had their accounts closed, inactivated, or their contacts ignored by Newsvine. Just a difference of opinion? Think so? I thought even Socialists believed in a free press. Apparently not. I voted for President Obama (like many Independents) hoping he was a centrist but I was wrong. It doesn't matter anymore anyway because the gravy train is almost over for the "Progressives." I can smell the fear ozing out of the TV screen. This time in history is just like when Woodrow Wilson was in office. The Progressives always thought they were smarter than the old dumb masses. The American people know when
something is wrong. Gee, now I realize why I don't watch NBC or MSNBS. Now I know not to respond to news stories on Newsvine (MSNBC, owned by MSN and NBC, owns Newsvine.) So remember people, every time you send an email on Hotmail (which is MSN) or you make a comment on Newsvine (which is NBC), you may never get your message thru. And we thought the Democrats were liberal.

call me Roy of SD 3:14PM February 15, 2010

Fox News and Media Bias

Related Articles

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Sam Dealey

Photos »

The White House »

Political Cartoons »

2012 Election »

Congress »