Barack Obama's Victory Was Not a Mandate for Liberalism

November 5, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (52)

So how should Democrats interpret last night's victories? Not as the broad mandate for liberalism that many of them would hope it to be.

Chiefly, Barack Obama ran most effectively as a moderate Republican. While he had plenty of big-money, liberal proposals (such as expanding healthcare), the candidate downplayed them after a few forays showed push-back. Instead, Obama gained traction by consistently emphasizing tax and spending cuts. There was a good deal of class warfare in there too, but the theme that most endured was cuts for 95 percent of taxpayers, not increases for the other 5 percent.

Given that voters overwhelmingly indicated the economy was their top issue, Republicans should take heart that Obama's mandate is what should be GOP turf. Where Republicans lost was on the trust factor: Independents drifted to Obama, and conservatives lost faith. Too many Republicans have talked about "the good folks back home" and lower spending, but the headlines show institutionalized corruption and ridiculous bridges to nowhere.

If independents voted for Obama because of tax cuts and balanced budgets, that means they remain essentially center-right. The GOP should spend the next four years shoring up its base. This means repudiating the Bush version of conservatism, characterized by astronomical spending, narrowly defined tax cuts, and a patronizing belief that all will be forgiven with a few sops thrown to the religious right.

Republicans are facing the reality that they have misgoverned for the better part of a decade. And while liberals must be tempted to believe they have four years of Christmas ahead, they will tax and spend at their own peril.

  • Click here to read more by Sam Dealey.
  • Click here to read more about Barack Obama.
  • Click here to read more about Taxes.
Tags:
Democratic Party,
2008 presidential election,
Barack Obama,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (52)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The republican talking points said that Obama was the most liberal senator and that he was a socialist.

But on November 4th, the American voters rejected conservative John McCain by almost 7.5 million votes. As a result Obama has no mandate for change?

Obama didn't run as a moderate, he ran as a Democrat and the people responded.

Crocker Jarmon of CA 3:45PM November 10, 2008

Now that Obama wins in a landslide Sam characterizies him as a "moderate Republican"? What a laff!!!

goshbiz of CA 7:19PM November 09, 2008

reality never was a republican strong point, you should let mr rove know that you can no longer create your own reality, the real reality will now resume. Sam give it up ,you were trounced, by a marist, socialist, muslem, terrorist. what will you un on in 20012?

bloke of NJ 7:03PM November 09, 2008

Sam Dealey

Sam Dealey

Sam Dealey, former editor of the Washington Times, is a principal at Monument Communications, a public-relations consultancy in Washington, D.C.

advertisement

advertisement