Sestak Job Offer Questions Underscore Obama's Lack of Transparency

May 26, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Ron Bonjean, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Just like the BP camera has allowed us to watch millions of gallons of oil spill into the Gulf of Mexico after the collapse of the “Deep Horizon” oil rig, President Obama should install an Oval Office camera or “Oval Cam” in the White House after the botched handling of Rep. Joe Sestak’s job offer. [See who contributes to Sestak.]

The American people are starving for transparency. Time and again, they have been lied to or misled by government and private institutions. Politicians who offer it willingly are praised while those that reject it or begrudgingly accept it are scorned. Transparency demonstrates that leaders and companies are on the level. It means as President Ronald Reagan said, “Trust, but verify.” BP quickly learned that once the camera broadcast the oil leak to millions of people in real time, the company can’t turn it off without sparking conspiratorial outrage.

President Obama is now suffering the consequences of breaking his transparency promises. In a memorandum to heads of executive agencies on WhiteHouse.gov, he said, “We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.”  

But his administration’s actions speak louder than his memos or campaign promises. It refused to allow cameras into daily negotiations on the healthcare bill. Instead, White House officials used a televised staged summit as a mea culpa to the public. The recently held nuclear summit closed to the press corps also comes to mind.

At last week’s signing ceremony for the Daniel Pearl Freedom of the Press Act, the White House ironically restricted media access as the president signed a free press bill. The event was open only to a limited pool of reporters and photographers who provided a report to fellow journalists. Obama refused to take questions saying, “I’m not doing a press conference today.” And in a speech to graduating students at Hampton University in Virginia, the President chided the 24-7 news cycle and the rise of technology as a distraction from democracy.

Finally, the White House has needlessly suffered a week of bad publicity over whether they offered a job to Sestak so that Sen. Arlen Specter could easily win the Democratic nomination in Pennsylvania. Administration officials were hammered by both Democrats and Republicans such as Sen. Dick Durbin and RNC Chair Michael Steele to come out with the facts. It is rather amusing to hear White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs say with a straight face that White House lawyers have looked into the matter and nothing inappropriate took place. Not to be cynical, but  one wonders if those same lawyers will now get a raise, a better title and an extra week of vacation after coming to such a conclusion. Of course, these situations usually end up with a full disclosure of what happened. So why fight it? [See which industries donated the most to Durbin.]

For the past few years, Republicans have been watching from the sidelines, recovering from their major losses. While observing a Democratic majority that is struggling to lead, they know they must reconnect with Americans who voted with the other side in the 2008 elections. As the White House is overwhelmed with questions regarding its cover-up of the Sestak issue, House Republicans launched AmericaSpeaksOut.com as a start to rebuilding that bridge of transparency. By going online and creating conversations around issues and solutions, it begins a new dialogue between constituents and elected officials. 

President Obama enlisted the support of millions of people online during the campaign, but has struggled to rekindle that original enthusiasm after he took office. If Republicans are lucky to get the majority back in the House and/or Senate, it will be much more challenging to lead than ever before. If they regain power, they must use it wisely and transparently or risk losing it for decades to come.

Tags:
Richard Durbin,
Arlen Specter,
Robert Gibbs,
Joe Sestak,
Michael Steele,
2010 election,
Barack Obama,
Congress,
democratic party,
oil,
media,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The American populace sided with the Democrats in 2006 as well... This Administration ran on 'Transparency', and yet has done nothing to the like. I have become more and more disenfranchised by the admin's handling of public affairs since Obama took office.

If there is a ring of truth to these new allegations in Pennsylvania and in Colorado, then the citizens of this fragile union must be compensated with an investigation - maybe more.

Obama came to office much in the same light as Jesse Ventura did - with hope that there would be change from 'business as usual'. What we got in both situations was 'even more business, and never you mind the unusual'.

Can we get a true statesman in any office and not more dirty politicians?

Alejandro of MN 1:20AM May 28, 2010

The old claim that no one likes to see sausage being made has long been used as a way of hiding process from public view in Washington and at every level of governance. Obama is no different from his predecessor or those around him in Washington, D.C. They hide their actions because they fear exposure of their real motives or ways of "doing business."

Well, Mr. and Mrs. America, doesn't it seem to you time for action to change all of that? When you head to political caucuses, town hall meetings, conventions, and the voting booth, act. Don't tolerate secrecy in government. Raise the issue and demand commitment to openness on the part of candidates.

Bonjean's post is a good one with just this one caveat: What are his motives? Are they political or are they really meant to do the right thing--clean up politics? Fess up, Bonjean. We've all had enough of that also guileful tactic of shouting across the ideological divide at one another as our way of doing business.

Ron W. Smith of UT 12:31PM May 27, 2010

http://www.americaspeakingout.com/

Bob of AZ 11:32PM May 26, 2010

Ron Bonjean

Ron Bonjean

Ron Bonjean is a partner with Singer Bonjean Strategies and the owner of the The Bonjean Company, both full service public affairs firms. He was chief of staff for the Senate Republican Conference under Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona and the top spokesman for House Speaker Dennis Hastert of Illinois, Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott of Mississippi, U.S. Commerce Secretary Don Evans, and other House members. Contact him at ron@singerbonjean.com

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement