• Comment (7)

Democrats Will Have Upper Hand in Lame Duck Session of Congress

May 8, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Rep. Chris Van Hollen, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, is cautiously optimistic that the expected lame duck session of Congress will produce the legislative action that seems impossible before the election. And he thinks that his side will have the upper hand in the lame duck as Republicans will be forced to reconcile their big deficit talk with their infatuation with bigger tax cuts.

Speaking to reporters this morning, Van Hollen noted that if all current laws are allowed to go into effect—if the Bush tax cuts expire, for example—it would automatically mean around a $5 trillion tax increase over 10 years. "It takes an act of Congress to extend them all," he noted. "There then is an opportunity for a negotiation where revenues are part of a deficit reduction plan ... I hope our Republican colleagues would agree that $2 trillion in revenue is better than $5 trillion."

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit]

It's an interesting dynamic because on the one hand the election pretty well paralyzes the Congress (neither side wanting to give the other a victory), but on the other there's a whole lot of, ahem, stuff that is going to hit the proverbial fan at the end of the year: the $5 trillion in tax hikes, the budget sequester—which no one likes—goes into effect. Oh, and at some point we'll hit the debt ceiling again. At the same time, while Republicans constantly strike a pose of preening virtue on the deficit, it always takes a back seat to their tax cut fetish.

Van Hollen added, "Now let me be clear. I'm not predicting that all of that is going to be resolved during the lame duck session. What I'm suggesting is that in the months after the election those action-forcing events could help bring the parties together. My hope would be that we would then reach a long-term solution to this."

He blames Republican obstinacy over raising tax revenue for the various standoffs, but indicated that the looming deadlines would give the Democrats a negotiating advantage.

Time will tell.

Tags:
Chris Van Hollen,
Congress,
deficit and national debt,
federal budget,
federal taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen is one of the proud members of the New Democratic Progressive Union Socialist Communist Party. If you want to see a list of the mottle pond scum in Congress google the progressive caucus. Van Hollen should be run out of Congress with some tar and feathers to help him on his way.

Pete of CA 7:08PM May 11, 2012

it's truly a sad commentary,that the only way Romney can be made to look good,by his supporters,is to nit pick about the president.

Perhaps it ;s because Romney had very little in the way of acomplishments during his time in public office.

bruce b of NV 10:28PM May 09, 2012

brucetee

1. Take another look at Bush tax cuts. Applied across the tax base. Still approximately 40 % pay no federal taxes at all

Actually burden of tax fell upon the rich MORE because of the tax cuts. As I have pointed out yesterday and many times in the past:

“According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Bush tax cuts actually shifted the total tax burden farther toward the rich so that in 2000-2004, total income tax paid by the top 40% of income-earners grew by 4.6% to 99.1% of the total.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/lying_about_bushs_tax_cuts.html

2. brucetee writes “Romney is little more than a flip-flopping empty suit.the more he says,the more this becomes evident”.

Do believe there are plenty of bum-bum flip flops. Have pulled out a few links with many in past to answer liberals complaining like you that we were changing our mind. One I recall had a hundred made by bum.

So glad GITMO is closed down. Enjoy the terrorist trial in NY. bum was for then against oil drilling. Etc...

Brad my man (joke) mentioned Ronald Reagan. Hear on this site heard that Ronald Reagan increased taxes. Which is true. I ALWAYS POINTED OUT for every $ 1.00 increase $2.00 was cut. Is that a flip flop ? I think circumstance dictate. There was a time when at each whistle stop different promises was made. Of course it still happens. But also even politicians can change their view. New information. Change of heart. All sorts of valid reasons.

Flip flopping is good or maybe bad, depends on circumstances. Long ago owning a slave was acceptable. Glad Republicans battled to right the wrong. Later, Democrats joined us after flip flopping...

Bill Hedges of MO 5:16PM May 09, 2012

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement