• Comment (5)

Why the 2012 GOP Race Isn't a Replay of the Obama-Clinton Contest

March 14, 2012 RSS Feed Print

One of the more interesting comparisons that keeps coming up in relation to the GOP’s neverending primary season is to the Barack Obama-Hillary Clinton race of four years ago. I’ve thought for a while that the critical difference between ’08 and ’12 lay in the quality of the candidates. I remember four years ago being torn between Obama and Clinton because I liked them both—a far cry from the days of, “Well I guess Gore’s OK, better than Bradley anyway,” and “Yeah I’ll vote for Kerry, he’s got a better chance than Dean.” You’d be hard pressed to find a Republican who could with a straight face and clear conscience assert that they’re torn between Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich because golly they’re all so talented.

[Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP presidential race.]

The good folks over at the Pew Research Center released a new poll today which helps put some statistical meat on my argument’s bones. Only 49 percent of GOP and GOP-leaning registered voters think that the Republican field is excellent or good this year, according to the new survey, while 48 percent think that their candidates are fair or poor. Contrast those numbers with the Democrats four years ago. In February of 2008, 80 percent of Democrats described Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton as being excellent or good candidates, Pew’s Michael Domick told reporters this morning at a breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. “They were thrilled,” he said.

Overall, four years ago, 56 percent of voters viewed Obama favorably, a number that hasn’t changed, while 45 percent had a positive view of eventual GOP nominee John McCain. Today only 29 percent view Romney favorably, while 27 percent have a positive view of Santorum.

[Enter the debate: Should Newt Gingrich drop out?]

In a way, this isn’t a GOP replay of the 2008 Democratic race, it’s a mirror universe, bizarre version of it.

The one commonality is a driving loathing for the incumbent president. “Arguably that’s still there among Republicans, and that’s the question—will that fire bring them all back together?” Domick said. “But Democrats had both” the excitement and the anger.

Tags:
Rick Santorum,
2008 presidential election,
Barack Obama,
politics,
2012 presidential election,
Hillary Clinton,
Newt Gingrich,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

SCHEISSLINGER'S REVISIONIST HISTORY IS A HOOT...

Most everyone else who followed the knock-down drag-out no-holds-barred 2008 fight between Obama and Clinton remember not how they were torn between picking one of the candidates but the knock-down drag-out no-holds-barred parts.

And now the only ones trying to compare the 2012 republican primary to the 2008 democrat primary are the ones like Scheisslinger, eager to rewrite the 2008 democrat primary as such a wonder-filled period of bliss.

And there's a good driving reason for Scheisslinger to try and rewrite the 2008 democrat primary history:

It's beyond obvious now how Hillary would have been a much-better democrat president than Obama turned out to be. She wouldn't have tried to grab for EVERYTHING everytime. She would have ended up getting way more than Obama did in terms of democrat party ideals, without turning the country upside-down and splitting it in half.

Clinton would have been a well-planned heist, like the Thomas Crown Affair. Obama turned out to be a liquor store smash-n-grab artist.

But that's Scheisslinger's worry, how Obama threw away democrat control of the House and now stands to lose it all for the democrats.

HEY JOHN OF NY: Give up already on BILL of MO. Everybody knows EXACTLY what Rep. Paul would and wouldn't do as the next president -- via that mighty and much-needed executive-order and -veto pen. And that includes Bill of MO.

It's clear to even the intentionally dimmest of the dim -- SCHEISSLINGER -- that things are about Executive Branch leadership -- not 'compromise.'

dom youngross of OH 1:50AM March 17, 2012

Bill Hedges of Mo, you still don't see it. The federal government is prohibited by law (the contstitution) from doing most of the [harmful] things it IS doing. The federal goverment is charged with national defense and treaty and trade aggreements internationally and interstate. The federal government also is to have a court system to resolve disagreements. The point is that the federal government is Prohibited from doing all the OTHER things it does .......and for very good reason!

Does this help you see it Bill? Washington DC is not Supposed to and is not Allowed to by the highest law of the land.......run our lives. So the best accomplishment is putting us back into a sustainable government structure well designed to work. Come on Bill, be American.. aren't you old enough to see how rotten 'over reaching' central goverments make things? You find the Congress to be Correct in it's 'business as usual'?

It's the SIZE of the federal government that is the source of trouble here. Ron Paul's campaign is the caution against class warfare in Ameria (pitting dems against republicans) and against rule from afar. In a healthy society, citizens have a broad measure of local control over thier lives.

John of NY 5:41AM March 16, 2012

John of NY

I can't say what Paul will do. He's done NOTHING. Voted NO...

Takes compromise to accomplish in D.C. and Paul has no experience that shows. You always say Paul _WILL_, you never say _WHAT HE DID_...

Bill Hedges of MO 8:46PM March 15, 2012

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement