• Comment (16)

Why Does Newt Gingrich Think America Is a 'Nightmare'?

November 20, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Steve Benen notes the line from Saturday night’s GOP debate which struck him as most important:

The quote came from Newt Gingrich, who condemned the very idea of a secular state. "A country that has been now since 1963 relentlessly in the courts driving God out of public life shouldn't be surprised at all the problems we have," the thrice-married, serial adulterer said. "Because we've in fact attempted to create a secular country, which I think is frankly a nightmare."

Benen makes some good points reacting to the quote itself, noting for example that it was the Founding Fathers who created a secular country and suggesting that if Newt would like a theocracy he might see how things work in Saudi Arabia and Iran.

[Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP field.]

But it raised another question for me, specifically as relates to each party’s spin machine. How would the conservative echo chamber react if Barack Obama made a similar statement? I imagine you’d see a lot of outraged headlines similar to the one adorning this blog post, though perhaps not as consciously written to exaggerate to make a point.

If you doubt it just look at the GOP’s latest talking point, that President Obama called Americans “lazy” in a speech at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation summit. Republicans are lying on this count—the quotation is taken dramatically out of context--the president was suggesting that U.S. policymakers have been lazy about selling this country to businesses. (This is an imperfect analogy as it is much easier to read Gingrich's comment as being condemnatory of the country than it is to find a blanket assertion of American laziness in Obama's speech.)

[See editorial cartoons about the GOP.]

So to answer my own question if the Democratic spin machine was as efficient and dishonest as the GOP’s has proven to be, we’d see a stream of condemnations of Gingrich for calling America a “nightmare.”

Tags:
2012 presidential election,
Newt Gingrich,
Barack Obama,
politics,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Phil Esteen of TX

I would not call Newt a “centrist pragmatism”

“Centrists don't have party lines. Centrists believe that solutions are more important than bias. While there is no set rule for what a Centrist is, there are some generally accepted guidelines that seem to depict the Centrist mode of thought.”

“The goal is not compromise, but rather pragmatism based on reasonable considerations, short and long-term. In other words, decisions and policies based on the best answer, not the compromise between two flawed perspectives that are ideologically opposed.”

http://uscentrist.org/about/party/what-is-centrist

Phil, I assume these definitions is what you are talking about. Newt does have a party line (more or less) and opposed to barry's beliefs. But call Newt “pragmatism” I certainly agree.

You write “religious nuts.” How judgmental sounding ! How do you come to that irrational sounding conclusion ? Enlighten me on your reasoning. Surely you are not open to spurts of irrational exuberance.

Do write your contemptuous charges against Newt so I may logically discuss your view.

Phil says “Right wingers have to be the most egregious idiots on the American political landscape.” Very colorful ! Was the left wingers booted out Nov. 2, 2010. barry has horrible polls. Which side does the voters been showing as the “egregious idiots” ?

Your summation is “And the unbelievable hypocrisy of it all is laughable.” Do explain so perhaps I can laugh as well...

Bill Hedges of MO 6:02PM November 21, 2011

this is just more rhetoric and acrimony from the new g.o.p. flavor of the week.,the pillsbury doughboy better known as newt gingrich.

newt's inflammatory commentary is just his way of pandering for votes along with promoting his line of books and cd;s

the far right are all for religious freedom,as long as that religion is one that they embrace.

bruce b of NV 12:45PM November 21, 2011

Right wingers have to be the most egregious idiots on the American political landscape.

Just when I thought Newtie was going to embrace rational, centrist pragmatism he has to go and cater to "I got my own special end times theory" crowd of religious nuts.

And the unbelievable hypocrisy of it all is laughable.

Phil Esteen of TX 10:37AM November 21, 2011

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement