The Origins of That Eisenhower 'Every Gun That Is Made...' Quote

September 30, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Perhaps my favorite quotation from the late President Dwight Eisenhower is making the rounds on Facebook in the form of a virtual poster produced by a progressive Facebook group called “The Other 98%.” If you’ve got any progressive friends, you’ve probably seen it (pasted below), though it’s too bad they didn’t use more of the quote. It’s a really remarkable and eloquent piece of rhetoric:

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final

sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone.

It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.

The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities.

It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population.

It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some 50 miles of concrete highway.

We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat.

We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.

This, I repeat, is the best way of life to be found on the road. the world has been taking.

This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.

A couple of friends have asked me about the origins of this speech, and specifically whether Ike wrote it. The short answer is that it’s a collaboration, but certainly the key sentiment came from the president. [Check out the month's best political cartoons.]

As I recount in White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters, the circumstance was the March, 1953 death of Joseph Stalin. Eisenhower felt that the Soviet dictator’s demise provided an opportunity to nip the Cold War in the bud. It prompted him to give a speech that would be titled “The Chance for Peace.” Here’s the key section from Ghosts:

More than a week after Stalin’s death, Eisenhower was talking with speechwriter Emmet Hughes about the address. “Look, I am tired—and I think everyone is tired—of just plain indictments of the Soviet regime,” Ike said. “I think it would be wrong—in fact, asinine—for me to get up before the world now to make another one of those indictments. Instead, just one thing matters. What have we got to offer the world?”

As Eisenhower spoke, it seemed to Hughes that his contemplation was drawing to a close. Ike’s thoughts were now coalescing. The president stopped and, jaw set, stared out the window onto the South Lawn. The tiny speck of an F-86 Sabre buzzed across the sky.

In an instant his reverie broke, and he wheeled around. “Here is what I would like to say. The jet plane that roars over your head costs three quarter of a million dollars. That is more money than a man earning ten thousand dollars every year is going to make in his lifetime. What world can afford this sort of thing for long? We are in an armaments race. Where will it lead us? At worst to atomic warfare. At best, to robbing every people and nation on earth of the fruits of their own toil.

“Now, there could be another road before us—the road of disarmament. What does this mean? It means for everybody in the world: bread, butter, clothes, homes, hospitals, schools—all the good and necessary things for decent living. …”

Eisenhower and Hughes would go over a dozen drafts of the speech, each of which the president carefully edited. It survived criticism from quarters as disparate Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill who thought an overt peace overture a mistake.

When he gave the speech, to the American Society of Newspaper Editors in April of 1953, Ike was ill and was barely able to deliver it.

Luckily for all of us, he did—even out of the Cold War context, it remains magnificent presidential statement.

Tags:
Facebook,
Presidential speech transcripts,
Dwight D. Eisenhower,
national security terrorism and the military

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

11/14/11 Vet. WWII

Last week I waas asked if I had a Happy Veterans Day.I thought of the men and women who's lives are 'over' over there and of those who will be returning over there, wondering if they will return. What of we old Vets. and the jobs we did apparently not to well because new wars(police actions?)arise. What of the families who've lost their homes to bad mortgages and failed jobs? Can you afford the food and products that are reducing in size and quality? But most important what of the children what are we leaving them? Quality,quantity, or disaster. Don't forget, there millions of them all over the world. I think we will be leaving an empty bucket for them.

Charles W. Knopf of PA 4:01PM November 14, 2011

Thank you for this historical perspective about Eisenhower. As he was actually in the military and saw the horrors of war firsthand, he had a unique perspective from which to judge. The majority of modern Presidents have not served nor seen service in a war.

For those who are fiscally conservative, as I am, since 2001 the twin wars of Iraq and Afghanistan have added $4 trillion to the deficit. If we note that the federal deficit is $14 trillion, that is a very significant addition to the debt in the past 10 years. Wiser members of both political parties acknowledge that spending cuts must be made to defense and military spending.

Here is another quote:

Over the past decade, when we had no serious national adversaries, U.S. defense spending has gone from about a third of total worldwide defense spending to 50 percent. In other words, we spend more on defense than the planet's remaining countries put together.

~ Fareed Zakaria - August 3, 2011

For those who think continuing military spending should continue at its present pace, the U.S. Military is all volunteer and I am sure would appreciate your enlistment and service. To help pay for defense and military spending, one can always send in additional money payable to the U.S. Treasury, asking that it be applied to military expenditures, though that request may be denied, at least you will be showing your full support of current military spending.

Observer of ID 1:25PM October 01, 2011

HA, HA. HO, HO. HEE, HEE...

It was the libprogs who got into bed with the Bush-Cheney neocon war-n-waste mongers back in 2008 when they patted Candidate Obama on the back for his promised Af-Pak escalation.

That was under the assumption of a quid-pro-quo: The libprogs went along with war-n-waste as promised by Candidate Obama -- under the cover story of 'smarter' war-n-waste -- thinking they would then get a whole bunch of domestic-spending goodies from President Obama.

And the libprogs did get a whole lot of domestic-spending goodies, for a while, with all the stimuli.

Now that the Obama goody well has more than run dry, Scheisslinger tries to equate libprogs with opposition to perpetual war-n-waste.

Ha, ha. Ho, ho. Hee, hee. Very funny from Scheisslinger. But not in a good way.

Ron Paul, 2012. All the *****REAL***** best of liberalism, progressivism, and conservativism in one candidate. Obama, Bachmann, Romney, and Perry are all self-serving cartoon characters in comparison to Paul.

dom youngross of OH 5:29PM September 30, 2011

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

The GOP Finally Finds Its Soul Mate

The rise of Rick Santorum coincides with the return of culture war.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama’s War on Religion

The uproar over the Obamacare contraception mandate is about more than just birth control and Catholics

Latest Video

advertisement