Tim Pawlenty Cribs 'Better Deal' From LBJ

June 8, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty unveiled his economic plan Tuesday and it quickly and rightly drew ridicule from the left and the right for its fantastical assumptions and projections. Pawlenty termed his plan a "Better Deal," an apparent attempt to rhetorically echo FDR's "New Deal," in encapsulating his plan. But with this particular reach he found rhetorical ground already (if briefly) claimed by Lyndon Johnson.

[See a slide show of the 2012 GOP contenders.]

FDR's New Deal was followed by Harry Truman's "Fair Deal," and more than a decade after that by JFK's "New Frontier." As Johnson wrapped up his first 100 days in office, in the spring of 1964, he sat for a television interview with reporters from the three major TV networks. One reporter asked him whether he had come up with a similar catchphrase to sum up his economic program. LBJ, who had been "badgering" speechwriter Richard Goodwin to come up with something along those lines, floated the "better deal" notion.

I have had a lot of things to deal with the first 100 days and I haven't thought of a slogan, but I suppose all of us want a 'better deal,' don't we!

He would deploy the phrase in three speeches over the following nine days, but dropped it thereafter, apparently unsatisfied with it.

[Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the 2012 GOP hopefuls.]

So there would be some irony if Pawlenty sticks with the bit of verbiage throughout the campaign and makes it his own.

But even that irony would have a bit of an echo to it. In his search for a phrase to satisfy Johnson, Goodwin had consulted with White House professor-in-residence Eric Goldman. Goldman suggested to Goodwin the title of a 1937 Walter Lippmann book, The Good Society. As I recount in White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters:

There was no small irony in the suggestion: Lippmann's Good Society was not only a broadside against Johnson's hero, FDR, but against the New Deal and activist government generally, which he equated with fascism.

So LBJ passed on "Better Deal" to embrace "Great Society," which had its rhetorical roots in a broadside against the kind of activist government policies that he and FDR favored. Now Pawlenty has scooped up the rhetorical fragment LBJ cast off and done so in service of a radical small government plan that would have Johnson and Roosevelt spinning in their graves. [Check out political cartoons about the GOP.]

It just goes to show, I suppose, the malleability of slogans and rhetoric.

Tags:
unemployment,
John Kennedy,
Lyndon Johnson,
2012 presidential election,
Tim Pawlenty,
Franklin Delano Roosevelt

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Do you have any actual specifics that you can point out and verify, or are you just another of the long list of totally useless spitball shooters that we see come and go constantly?

junior of DC 12:43PM June 14, 2011

Bill H o' MO is the loyalist fan of Bush's Ownership Society and its resulting economic depression. Bill seems to keep advocating policies that hurts Americans, repeating his dumb hogwash like a broken record so much so that apparently he doesn't even believe his own lies anymore. It's hard to live a lie and its hard to keep up such disingenuous mudslinging everyday. You have to really hate your fellow American to keep up these lies.

Chuck of 12:27AM June 14, 2011

As usual wrongn brucet_ You forget HOW STUPID Democrats are !!!!They pushed through agendas into law the people HATED

Wrong about Cheney remark:

http://www.ontheissues.org/2004/Dick_Cheney_Budget_+_Economy.htm

__

Bush warned of recession first year in office:

"Pelosi Caught In Major Lie- Says Bush Didn't Warn Congress About Financial Crisis… Records Show He Warned Congress 17 Times in 2008 Alone"

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2010/05/pelosi-caught-in-major-lie-says-bush-didnt-warn-congress-about-financial-crisis-records-show-he-warned-congress-17-in-2008-alone/

___

As usual, tax cut to rich increased government revenue under Bush:

JEC Report_ Tax cuts to rich generate more governmemt revenue...

"Since 1984 the JEC has provided factual information about the impact of the tax cuts of the 1980s. For example, for many years the JEC has published IRS data on federal tax payments of the top 1 percent, top 5 percent, top 10 percent, and other taxpayers. These data show that after the high marginal tax rates of 1981 were cut, tax payments and the share of the tax burden borne by the top 1 percent climbed sharply. For example, in 1981 the top 1 percent paid 17.6 percent of all personal income taxes, but by 1988 their share had jumped to 27.5 percent, a 10 percentage point increase. The graph below illustrates changes in the tax burden during this period."

http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/reagtxct/reagtxct.htm

1. brucet have said obamacare would eventual save money. He does that by destroyer medicare:

"cuts in payments to doctors and hospitals under Medicare as provided in current law due to Obamacare and President Obama’s Medicare reimbursement policies is $15 trillion!"

"These Medicare cuts were the foundation for CBO finding that Obamacare would actually reduce the deficit, despite adopting or expanding three entitlement programs.

http://www.912superseniors.org/2011/05/why-paul-ryans-medicare-is-so-much-better-than-obamas/

2. brucet says “vouchercare plan was to ever become law countless seniors would be priced out of the healthcare market”.

“Beginning in 2022, the Ryan plan offers each new Medicare enrollee a choice of private health plans and a premium paid to the plan they choose. The key is that the premium will be equivalent to what Medicare is projected to spend under the Obama health law: $15,000 a year on average, more for the oldest enrollees, less for the youngest, all inflation adjusted."

“The Ryan proposal also includes a $7,800 annual medical savings account to help low-income seniors with out-of-pocket costs. Amazingly, the CBO analysts exclude this $7,800 benefit from their calculations. Their warning about low-income seniors suffering is baseless."

http://www.lincolnclub.org/2011/04/paul-ryans-premium-support-plan-is-preferable-to-obamas-rationing-panel/

Bill Hedges of MO 11:55PM June 12, 2011

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters. E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement