Where Did the National Debt Come From?

April 15, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (21)

Gallup reported yesterday that a greater percentage of Americans (17 percent) are identifying the issue of the federal budget deficit and the debt as the most pressing favoring the country than at any time in the last 15 years. This is not surprising given the fact that it has been the dominant debate in Washington since the 2010 election, and especially in the last week or so as Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan laid out the GOP plan to solve the issue Wednesday President Obama unveiled his solution.

(As an aside, the fact that the deficit has become the driving issue in Washington might come as a surprise to anyone who looks closely at Gallup’s poll and sees that while more people name the deficit as the top issue, it’s still only the third most important issue, after the economy in general (26 percent) and unemployment (19 percent).) [Check out editorial cartoons about the economy.]

A critical part of the fiscal debate of course is the question of where to lay the blame for the current problem. This isn’t merely a partisan exercise, but helpful in figuring out who has credibility in terms of solving the crisis.

[See political cartoons about the budget deficit and national debt.]

So who got us into this mess? The best take I’ve seen comes from a recent New York Times piece on the upcoming debt ceiling debate. The Times’s Jackie Calmes writes:

In fact, the debt was created by both parties and past presidents as well as Mr. Obama.

Of the nearly $14.2 trillion in debt, roughly $5 trillion is money the government has borrowed from other accounts, mostly from Social Security revenues, according to federal figures. Several major policies from the past decade when Republicans controlled the White House and Congress — tax cuts, a Medicare prescription-drug benefit and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — account for more than $3.2 trillion.

The recession cost more than $800 billion in lost revenues from businesses and individuals and in automatic spending for safety-net programs like unemployment compensation. Mr. Obama’s stimulus spending and tax cuts added about $600 billion through the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30.

A good summary to keep handy as the debt and budget debates unfold.

Tags:
George W. Bush,
Paul Ryan,
debt,
Congress,
Gallup,
deficit and national debt,
New York Times,
unemployment,
Barack Obama,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (21)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The question Bo Tai possibly wanted to put front and center is where did the *federal* debt come from -- there is no 'national' financial debt. The straightforward answer to that is from the Federal Reserve Bank, via Congress. The more-involved answer is from a debt-based fiat money system, as enabled by the Federal Reserve Bank, as abdicated to by a profligate and pandering Congress.

And did Bo Tai or US News give us this rollover link (budget deficit and debt):

http://politics.usnews.com/topics/subjects/deficit-and-national-debt

Again with the 'national.' Is it just Bo Tai who doesn't know the distinction between national and federal, or is it the entirety of US News as well?

But let's get to Bo Tai's more-likely question: Given we're not Q and the space-time continuum limits our actions to the present, at this moment, who is credible when it comes to the federal debt, in terms of what to do about it?

President Obama's original 'debt-reduction plan' was to double the annual deficit and then cut it in half -- four years later. Now President Obama's latest 'debt-reduction plan' is spread over twelve, not four, years. And that latest Obama 'debt-reduction plan' came about only because he and Reid were dragged to it, by Boehner via the Tea Party via the Nov. 2010 midterms.

Though already half over, we wouldn't even have a federal budget for the rest of this fiscal year, nor any serious consideration of debt reduction, if not for the republicans, as empowered and motivated by the Tea Party. That current, curiously-sudden, spur-of-the-two-year-moment (Obama + Reid) - Pelosi 12-year 'debt-reduction plan' is a wart-like outgrowth of the (Reid + Pelosi) - Obama one-year congressional plan post Feb. 2010 to not make yet another whopping federal deficit from Obama official prior to the Nov. 2010 midterms.

Anybody else pick up on the curiously-sudden nature of that 12-year 'debt-reduction plan' from Obama? Within a week of being dragged to the budget agreement that averted a federal government shutdown, hmmm, Obama has a new 'debt-reduction plan.' Curious, isn't it, how quickly that emerged into public view?

Take your pick between a magnifying glass and a scanning electron microscope: You won't find debt-reduction credibility in either (Obama + Reid) - Peloi or (Reid + Pelosi) - Obama. None of them had any debt-reduction credibility before the Nov. 2010 midterms -- as they most certainly pounded the hell out of debt-creation -- and all of them have even less now. At the current rate of democrat BS tripling every couple years, by Aug. 2012, Obama's latest-latest 'debt-reduction plan' will be spread out over not four, not twelve, but 36 years.

-------------------------------

P.S. Bo Tai when credible is Tea Party, with a two-week lagtime:

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2011/04/15/the-numbers-behind-the-385-billion-or-352-million-budget-deal

dom youngross of OH 11:45AM April 17, 2011

We need to give more money to Cindy Mack and Susan Karches! We should eliminate Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security and give all of those proceeds to Waterfall TALF Opportunity. We should also create special "non-recourse loans" to elite media pundits and reporters who are bravely scolding America into giving up their silly entitlements. This would repair all of the problems in the world....don't you all agree?

Working Man of ID 9:34AM April 17, 2011

You speak as though presidents can spend as they wish. The house is the one who does the spending. The president can submit all the budgets he wants. Doesn't mean congress has to agree. The surpluses in the 90's were with a repub controlled congress but Clinton gets the credit since he was president. This does not take into account demagoguery and politics being played as both sides of the aisle will spend themselves into re-election. We can play the blame game on which side is at fault as I once used to. Problem is, you will look stupid if you tow either party line. The real issue here is neither side is serious about reduction. Tax increases are not the answer. People being responsible for themselves would be a start. Quit relying on government to take care of everything.

Another question-where did all the stimulus money go and what did it accomplish other than bailing out big banks and AIG- by the way- all these people are rich because of the bailouts. And dems and repubs both agreed upon this, so the notion the dems are looking out for the little guy is a joke. I figured that out 30+ years ago. I hope Donald Trump runs and ruffles a few feathers. At least he doesn't pander to everyone and speaks his mind. About time someone spoke up and quit worrying about who they might offend. America is a deeply divided nation-(thought Obummer was supposed to fix that), and the world is in unrest like I've never seen (thought Obummer was supposed to fix that too). I am an independent conservative-the repubs don't represent me either, they are weak and spineless and just try to be dems. We need a true leader who doesn't care about re-election- I know this is unrealistic looking at who is considering running, so I guess I'll just concede that we will no longer be the great nation we once were. It's a shame.

Karl Gene of NV 11:36PM April 16, 2011

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement