Sarah Palin, Donald Trump Winning the GOP 2012 Blog Primary

March 30, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (29)

Sarah Palin has taken a commanding lead in blog coverage of the GOP 2012 primary, according to a new New York Times report, with Donald Trump, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, and Michele Bachmann following distantly behind her. Traditional media, by contrast, tend to cover a slightly more staid and perhaps more plausible set of potential candidates. I wonder if this divergence isn’t in part a reflection of how the never-ending search for Web traffic is affecting coverage of the race. Call it the blog primary, or perhaps the SEO primary.

[See political cartoons about the GOP.]

The Times’s Nate Silver had an interesting post yesterday afternoon looking at the differences in how blogs and newspapers are covering the nascent Republican presidential primary field over the last month. According to Silver’s statistic, which he generated using Google News and Google Blog Search, there’s a real split in the coverage. Traditional media is focusing, Silver reports, on Gingrich, Palin, Mitt Romney, Haley Barbour, and Tim Pawlenty. Blogs on the other hand are giving a lions share of their attention to Palin, Trump, Gingrich, Paul, and Bachmann, and with startlingly skewed results.

[See editorial cartoons about Sarah Palin.]

The five most-covered in newspapers range from Gingrich getting 14.7 percent of the news coverage to Pawlenty and Barbour getting 9.7 percent--a reasonably tight grouping. Among blogs, on the other hand, Palin has gotten a whopping 30.2 percent share. Trump trails with 9.9 percent, followed by Paul (8.6 percent), Gingrich (7.6 percent), and Bachmann (6.7 percent). Silver writes:

One feature of this year’s coverage, which was not so apparent in the 2008 election cycle, is that the candidates who are receiving the most attention in blogs are also those who would probably have the most difficult time in a general election against Barack Obama.

Or to put it another way, blogs are focusing on the most, ahem, colorful and controversial candidates. Trump’s share is no doubt being driven by his recent foray into Birther-land, for example. Gingrich, after years of emphasizing the political intellectual side of his image has unleashed Newt the blundering bomb-thrower, flip-flopping on Libya, ascribing his past marital infidelities to his passion for country, and most recently fretting that his grandchildren would live in an America that was simultaneously secular-atheist and radically Muslim. (Maybe these Muslims would be so radical as to renounce Allah and be atheists?) Bachmann and Palin are cut from the same fire-starting rhetorical cloth and Paul has a devoted following around the country.

[See a roundup of editorial cartoons about the Tea Party.]

And to some extent this points up a difference between traditional media culture and the new online ethos. Even today newspapers fundamentally operate more from a point of view of giving readers they need even if it’s not necessarily news they want. So their coverage leans toward candidates that polls and/or conventional wisdom deem to have the greatest chance of earning the Republican nomination. Blogs, I suspect, tend to be driven more directly by a search for Web traffic, so their coverage tends to focus on the more, ahem again, interesting candidates because they are more likely to be searched for online. If you doubt it, spend some time over at Google insights, a Google tool which compares search volume for different terms over; punch in Sarah Palin, Donald Trump, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, and Tim Pawlenty, and see who people have been searching for in the last 30 days. [See photos of Palin and her family.]

Bloggers will tend to go where the page views are. And then they’ll aim to use "search engine optimization," or SEO, to snag those page views. That means, very basically, getting the terms people are looking for into your headline (like, for example, having "Sarah Palin," "Donald Trump," "GOP" and "2012" in a headline) and article in the hopes that Google will spit that article out for those search terms.

So the question is (again): Is the news you want also the news you need?

 

Tags:
blogs,
Tim Pawlenty,
Donald Trump,
Ron Paul,
2012 presidential election,
Haley Barbour,
Republican Party,
New York Times,
Michele Bachmann,
Newt Gingrich,
Sarah Palin,
politics,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (29)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Did you know that TRUMP in English means <> get this . . .

F A R T

So . . . If he's elected pres, we can call him . . .

President FART. He's a GASBAG FILLED with FLATULENCE anyway. We ALL knew that, so how appropriate is the translation of his name:

TRUMP = FART

Don't ya love it when a plan comes together!!

Bowzerbird of WA 7:37PM May 02, 2011

Finally, someone has the guts to say it. I'm so glad Mr Trump is jumping into the Fray.. Please keep on asking the critical questions about the Presidents leadership or lack thereof abilities. The other Repubs cower at what the media will make of them.. Keep on Donald..

I have a theory that we are in a ~30 year cycle.. see if this makes send. Each President is separated by about 30 year.. Eisenhower-Regan, Kennedy/Johnson-Clinton, Nixon-GW Bush, Carter-Obama.... So who's our next Eisenhower or Regan... The Donald??

While there's plenty of incompetence in the Obama administration I DO NOT underestimate a lot of what they are doing is on purpose. I could name many things but not enough space here.

Julian of TX 6:01PM April 15, 2011

Hey folks want to read something that will blow ya away......SLEASY "B" Your President at work

.New Word For The Day - "Dhimmitude" - What Does It Mean?

Obama used it in the health care bill. Now isn't this interesting? It was used in the health care law. Every day there's another revelation of what Obama and his fellow Democrats are doing to our country.

Dhimmitude -- I had never heard the word until now. Type it into Google and start reading. Pretty interesting. It's on page 107 of the healthcare bill. I looked this up on Google and yep, it exists. It is a REAL word. Word of the Day: Dhimmitude Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-muslim populations conquered through jihad. Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting conquered remnants to Islam. Obama Care allows the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia Muslim diktat in the United States . Folks, this is exclusively an Islamic concept under Sharia Law. So exclusive they had to make up an English word to define the concept. Why would our government start interjecting Sharia Law concepts into new broad and sweeping legislation like health care that would control the US population? ....Anyone?

Muslims are specifically exempted from the government mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty tax for being uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be "gambling", "risk-taking", and "usury" and is thus banned. Muslims are specifically granted exemption based on this. How convenient. So a Christian, will have crippling IRS liens placed against all of their assets, including real estate, cattle, and even accounts receivables, and will face hard prison time because they refuse to buy insurance or pay the penalty tax. Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan and all other US Muslims will have no such penalty and will have 100% of their health needs paid for by the de facto government insurance. Non-Muslims paying a tax to subsidize Muslims. This is Sharia Law definition of... Dhimmitude. This is not a Western Civilization concept.

Dhimmit has two purposes: To enrich Muslims AND to drive conversions to Islam. "Sure, I'll be a muslim if it means free health insurance and no taxes. Where do I sign, bro?" I recommend sending this post to your contacts. This is desperately important and people need to know about it -- quickly!This really is happening in your country. A fraction at a time.Wake up America ! They're coming in the back door.

To check it out on Snopes click here: Health Insurance Exemptions.

http://www.snopes.com/politics...

Bob of OH 2:56PM April 15, 2011

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement