Under Obama Taxes Reach Lowest Level Since Truman

February 8, 2011 RSS Feed Print

We’re overtaxed right? Especially under that confiscatory socialist Barack Hussein Obama, who the Wall Street Journal called “a determined man of the left whose goal is to redistribute much larger levels of income across society.” Umm … not so much. This from the AP:

Taxes too high?

Actually, as a share of the nation's economy, Uncle Sam's take this year will be the lowest since 1950, when the Korean War was just getting under way.

And for the third straight year, American families and businesses will pay less in federal taxes than they did under former President George W. Bush, thanks to a weak economy and a growing number of tax breaks for the wealthy and poor alike.

For those of you keeping score at home, federal tax receipts this year are expected to be about 14.8 percent of GDP. By contrast that figure was 17.5 percent in tax cut warrior George W. Bush’s last full year in office. [See editorial cartoons about the economy.]

And as Washington Monthly’s Steve Benen, who flagged this, points out:

Of course, this is only looking at federal taxes, and doesn't reflect state and local taxes, but a USA Today analysis found last year that if we include everything -- federal, state, and local taxes, including income, property, sales, and other taxes -- the percentage of personal income that's paid in taxes is still at its lowest level since 1950.

As Michael Ettlinger, head of economic policy at the Center for American Progress, said at the time, "The idea that taxes are high right now is pretty much nuts."

Keep these statistics in mind when the great budget debate starts in the coming weeks and we start hearing about Obama the deranged tax raiser again.

Tags:
unemployment,
Harry S Truman,
Barack Obama,
taxes,
GDP,
federal taxes,
Associated Press

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

ahahahahahaha! lower taxes? your a moron. Let's explain this phenomenon. the median US income in 2007 was 52,673 the median income in 2010 was46,326. therefore the tax percentage would actually be higher. This equates to a net income in 2007 of43553 and a net income of 39470 in 2010. Americans lost 4083 a year of net income. Now let's factor in Obamacare the cost for group health coverage has more than tripled in the past three years. Let's explore why?? Well lets pretend I am CEO of an HMO and I have a president that is going to mandate health insurance for all Americans HMMM I wonder if I shouldn"t raise my rates? Gee thats a no brainer. There goes another 12,000 a year out of the family budget. Now the average net income just plummeted to 34287. Factor in the almost tripled food, and utility prices not too mention gas prices. The average family doesn't have a dime left. These aren't the rich suffering these are the average median families. And yet you have the audacity to publish this nonsense. Stupid or Evil that's the question people should be asking!!!!!!!!

tina of PA 10:16PM May 14, 2012

I think you should re-read the taxes. I worked in the1960's, and never had taxes as high as they are today. Also, compare the Gas tax of Truman's years, to the Gas tax today. The reason for the tax income being low, is due to the jobs being history. Our economy sucks, and he is giving the Terrorist nations $Billions while the American people are getting shorted.

Redfox007 of MT 11:09PM March 17, 2012

Face it you're preaching to people like Bilbo who like to change Barack to Barry just to be insulting and not call the man by that "ferrin" name.

Any progress is 'in spite of' Obama, every move countered by the lobbyists and Republican congress that causes us to not move forward proves Obama is bad. You cant convince them. They think that 'not thinking too much about' Bin Laden was better than tracking down the madman who attacked us and killing him.

They think that asking the rich to pay the same percentage in taxes as a secretary is class warfare and that corporations are people and would NEVER try to buy an election with their billions of untraceable wealth donated to super PACS.

I dont know what happend to the conservatives I grew up with but they sure arent what exist today. These people are head in the sand nuts.

Ed White of VA 1:37PM February 10, 2012

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters. E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement