Senate Passes Historic 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal

December 18, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (26)

The Senate voted overwhelmingly—65-to-31—Saturday to repeal the 17-year old ban on gays serving openly in the military. Eight Republicans joined 57 Democrats on the right side of history. President Obama is expected to sign the bill into law some time before Christmas.

Now it’s up to the military to actually enact it, and as my friend Steve Clemons points out, this will take a while. But now that the shouting is over and the talking points can be consigned to history’s dustbin, does anyone really think that the greatest military force in history will fail—or, really, break  a sweat—at the task?

[See a roundup of editorial cartoons about 'don't ask, don't tell.]

The eight Republicans voting in favor of the repeal included a few surprises, most notably North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr, who had voted to support the GOP filibuster against the repeal. Burr, who won re-election just last month, spoke of a “generational transition” taking place in this country. “If the Republican from North Carolina is talking like this, opposition to homosexuality has, in some broader sense, lost its political juice,” Politico’s Ben Smith notes. Burr could make the vote because he was just re-elected. The other GOPer to support the filibuster but then flip was Sen. John Ensign, the scandal-ridden Nevadan who apparently hopes to win another term next year. He presumably made the vote in order to be re-elected. So it goes.

The other Republicans voting for repeal were Mark Kirk of Illinois, Scott Brown of Massachusetts, George Voinovich of Ohio, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Maine’s two moderates, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins. Brown and Snowe, like Ensign, are up for re-election in two years.

John McCain, who had kept saying he would support a repeal when the military did right up to the point where the military actually did, went down swinging. Decrying the “liberal bastions of America” and “elite schools” and “salons of Georgetown,” he sounded rather like a sad caricature from another age. All that was missing was yelling for those damn gay kids to get off his lawn. Salons of Georgetown? Seriously?

[See photos of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.]

Newly installed West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin skipped the vote because—I’m not making this up—he had a Christmas party to attend. He too is up for re-election in 2012. In the Manchin, Ensign, Brown, and Snowe votes you can get a sense of where the “generational transition” has taken hold and where it is lagging. But Burr is right, it is inevitable.

Now the action moves to the Pentagon and the U.S. military installations around the world. I covered the military for a few years; I have friends who have served and who are now serving. I have enormous admiration for our armed forces and haven’t the slightest doubt that they will deal with this transition with their usual levels of skill and success. In fact I’m sometimes surprised that members of the military don’t take greater offense to the notion from their alleged friends that they’re not capable of overcoming base prejudices.

In the mean time not only did the U.S. Senate do the right thing, but by a 2-to-1 margin. This should come as no surprise. Such controversial votes tend not to be close as people scramble to be on the right side of morality when they see passage is inevitable.

Tags:
John Ensign,
Lisa Murkowski,
Richard Burr,
George Voinovich,
LGBT rights,
Olympia Snowe,
2010 Congressional elections,
Mark Kirk,
Susan Collins,
Scott Brown,
Senate,
John McCain,
Obama administration,
Congress,
national security terrorism and the military,
Barack Obama,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (26)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Dustin of NC, I also serve on a submarine and I have to say that you sound like an ignorant retard. The guy that was kicked off your boat for molesting your "good friend" was because he sexually harassed another person, not for being gay. This other guy was removed from the boat because he couldn't handle the stresses that being on a submarine causes. Granted, his not conforming to military standards probably greatly contributed to the stress he was encountering, but still he removed himself by having suicideal thought and again NOT because he was gay. I've seen several people removed from the boat because they just can't handle it and some of them may very well have been gay but most were not. It's just a fact of submarines that people who can't conform to our standards are put under a lot pressure by the rest of the boat and quite a few people aren't prepared for that amount of pressure and become suicidal (or at least say they are). People that can't conform to rules or regulations are also removed by other means. Example: There was this guy that went to sleep in the outboard of the engineroom while on watch (sans boots and everything) and was then removed from the Navy. I think I speak for the majority of submariners when I say that I'd much rather have a gay guy on watch with me than a straight one who can't stay awake during his safety/security watch. It all comes down to whether or not we can count on that person to do their job. That's how we EARN our dolphins and why others should have had thiers taken away.

Matt of HI 11:10PM January 03, 2011

David. I'm calling you out.

Who the hell are you to be talking about integrity? How dare you group tons of people together and degrade them. Who do you think you are? Crazy radical Christian who believes he's doing the 'right thing'?

This is ridiculous. Talk about making a big deal out of nothing. Look at Canada, they've allowed gays to serve openly since the 90's, and they are doing absolutely fine. Keep your ignorant thoughts at your church.

Each person is an individual. INDIVIDUAL!

When you stereotype a group of people like you just did, you sound extremely unintelligent.

You're a retired general? Good, now hurry up and die and let the younger generation fix everything you've screwed up.

Good riddance.

Goodbye.

- Ryan

Ryan of SD 4:32AM December 29, 2010

Not well thought out. Tons of unintended consequences and major disruption. For instance. This repeal will open the door for "Trans Gendered" soldiers. What barracks will they be assigned? Also, what about the partially trans gendered? Women who have had their breast removed and take hormones to be male but still have female genitial? Or men who take hormones and have breast implants but still have male genitial? Keep in mind that poor hormone maintenance dictates that when the artificial hormones wear off the previous chacracteristics return. Where will these creatures shower? Will female solders stay in the same baracks as "Chaz Bono"? Or would he/she shower with the men? I don't believe Chaz has the full male toolset. He/she could claim discrimination. This will eventually end up at the supreme court.

John Doeskii of IL 2:20PM December 23, 2010

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement