Poll Gives Republicans Biggest Lead in 2010 Election

August 31, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

Will anyone be happier to see August go than Democrats? The party has been languishing in the worst kind of political summer doldrums, buffeted both by the president dipping his toe into unpopular end of a transitory political debate--regarding the so-called "ground zero mosque"--and by continuing bad news on more enduring issues, namely unemployment and the economy. What better capstone to the month, then, than the latest Gallup generic ballot for the 2010 midterm elections, giving Republicans a 10 point lead, their biggest ever.

[See a roundup of editorial cartoons about the 2010 midterm elections.]

That's "ever" not in the context of this election. That's "ever" in the context of 68 years of Gallup polling. That 10 point margin is twice as large as the GOP records that stood before this year, five points in both the summers of 1994 and 2002.

Gallup writes:

Republicans' presumed turnout advantage, combined with their current 10-point registered-voter lead, suggests the potential for a major "wave" election in which the Republicans gain a large number of seats from the Democrats and in the process take back control of the House.

Gallup's generic ballot has flip-flopped all year long. It gave Democrats a significant lead as recently as the middle of July, remember. So it will be interesting to see whether this lurch marks the electorate starting to break toward the GOP or whether the race tightens again in a week.

But the Gallup poll does also contain an ongoing trend that should scare the daylights out of Democrats: the GOP's chasm-like advantage in voter enthusiasm. Fully half of Republican voters are now "very enthusiastic" about voting in the fall, twice as many as Democrats (25 percent).

Labor Day will bring the traditional start of the campaign season, though really it's the beginning of the end of the campaign. As The Fix's Chris Cillizza notes, Democrats have one last line of defense upon which they can fall back in their fight to hold control of Congress. Chris writes:

The next few weeks will be critical to Democrats' hopes of holding onto the House. Most targeted Democratic incumbents as well as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee have fundraising edges over their GOP rivals. That means that Democrats will hit the television airwaves first with ads that, almost certainly, will seek to hammer their foes over a variety of issues ranging from Social Security to job creation.

If those ads move numbers against Republicans across the country, Democrats may be able to mitigate -- if not totally alleviate -- their losses. If the ads don't change voters' perception in a meaningful way, Democrats could be headed to an electoral Armageddon on Nov. 2.

Right on cue, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Monday released its first independent expenditure ad of the cycle, hitting GOP-er Sean Duffy who is running for the seat being vacated by retiring Democratic Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin. Do the Democrats have the cash to build a big enough firewall to hold the House? Stay tuned.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
David Obey,
2010 Congressional elections,
Republican Party,
Congress,
Gallup,
polls

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ho Ho Ho. I like the paid Democrat staffer replies from Jim of MI, Steve of IL and Ann of Geary.

As a Libertarian, I always find it amusing when the Dems continue to try to blame Obama's problems on Bush. Hint: Bush has been gone 2 years... Of course, it WAS Bush who started these Keynesian bail-outs, throwing $750 billion+ of taxpayers money at "companies too big to fail". This was picked up by Obama's $1.5 trillion bail-out "stimulus" fiascoes - and they ain't working either.

Didn't any of you ever read Mises or Hayek or Rothbard or Adam Smith - or any of the Austrian Economists? Marxist monetary policies always fail. If we're lucky, we'll only have 5 years of 25%+ inflation like in the bad old Jimmy Carter days. He was fired after 4 years too...

We're in a financial melt-down and heading into a vicious double-dip recession/depression and the Democrats are worse than asleep at the switch - they're turning up the juice - to kill off the free-market economy which keeps us all employed (except government workers who are making, on average, 50% more money than private industry workers...

So, you wonder why the American people - including Independents, Republicans and so-called "Blue Dog" Reagan Democrats are transferring the majority control of both the House and Senate back to the Repubs? Because the people get it. Big Government is the PROBLEM, not the solution. The best way to slow down this train wreck is to checkmate the process by making sure no one party has control of all the levers of power. D's in the White House, House & Senate = corruption and arrogance. Ditto R's.

Now the challenge will be to repeal, roll back and undo the mess that Obama and co. have got us into - following the same path that Bush began. Obama is simply Bush writ large. More spending, more war, more loss of personal freedoms. What a mess. Remember, I don't have a dog in either the D or R camp.

Comments invited from the professional Democrats (who are being paid to blog here) please. I'm doing this for free - and for my country, not my party job...

Tony of CA 12:27AM September 07, 2010

The news that will be more "bad" is if the American people choose to go back to the Republicans who put us into an illegal war, into a recession and cost us credibility with the rest of the world. Do they want more of the same? The loss of lives in a war of aggression, violating Genava agreements, loss of personal liberties, making travel more dangerous for Americans, giving tax breaks to the rich and on and on?

jim erwin of MI 7:54AM September 02, 2010

Nor did Obama ever intend to do so. This is another tea bagger lie. Tell me what wealth has been redistributed. NONE. Tax cuts have been given to 95% of the population and the top 2% will get tax cuts in the lower brackets to offset the higher top margin when the Bush tax cuts expire. A 35% top margin is unrealistically low for a country over $14 trillion in debt.

Wall Street put us in the spot we're in today, not the federal government. Bush & Co. refused to regulate the financial sector which net about 40% of all corporate profits when Bush left office. The GOP still resists financial regulation, even that which is designed to protect consumers from predatory lending and credit card interest gauging. The GOP is an obsticle to progress and I hope this truth emerges in November.

The private sector debt is three times the size of the public sector debt. This is what allowed the economy to grow over the past twenty years. Now public and private debt together amount to close to $56 trillion. To deleverage both simultaneously would create a depression and debt deflation making Germany in the early 1930s appear mild by comparison. It is very obvious that most of the users on this blog don't know economics of history. Their main purpose seems to be to shill for far right tea party causes.

steve of IL 7:32PM September 01, 2010

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement