Some Sarah Palin Endorsements Matter More Than Others

June 4, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Do endorsements matter? And specifically, do Sarah Palin's endorsements matter? Some more than others.

To wit, Politics Daily's Sandra Fish has an article today looking at the former half-term governor's track record endorsing candidates this cycle. It's a mixed bag, Fish concludes with Palin going 2-0 in gubernatorial endorsements thus far, but only 3-3 in congressional races. Of course such record keeping is rather beside the point. Palin's nod may have highlighted Rand Paul's Tea Party cred, for example, but she didn't create it. And by the same token, her endorsement of national Republican favorite Vaughn Ward in Idaho (in the race to face Rep. Walt Minnick) didn't lead to his defeat--rather it was his plagiarizing from Barack Obama and unrepentant ignorance of Puerto Rico's not being a foreign country.

Let's face it: In all but the rarest cases, endorsements don't swing elections. Their importance lies in what they tell us about the endorser, not about the endorsee. Which brings us to Palin's latest endorsement: Former Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, who is hoping to reclaim his old job.

[See political cartoons about Sarah Palin.]

Iowa, you will recall is the home of a certain key early presidential contest, prompting Andrew Sullivan, for one, to declare, "She's running." Or as his colleague Marc Ambinder puts it: Branstad's going to win, and he'll have a field operation every GOP presidential candidate would kill for. "If you're thinking about running for president, and I think Palin really is thinking about running for president, you don't get on the wrong side of the guy who will probably be governor during the caucuses by endorsing his opponent, no matter how conservative and Tea Partyish [Branstad opponent] Bob Vander Plaats seems to be," he writes.

So it's not so much that she's running, but that she's doing what she must to keep the door open.

Tags:
Iowa caucus,
Walt Minnick,
Tea Party,
2010 Congressional elections,
Congress,
Rand Paul,
Sarah Palin

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It is psychological: when you don't measure up, seek validation by attacking those who clearly are better than you in every measure. That is one clue to Palin's constant attempts to draw attention to herself daily by attacking President Obama. Secondly, hers is the childish reaction of a woman who thought she had a path to the White House but was dramatically stopped in her track by the Obama's political machine. Obama obtained a strong mandate from the American people while the McCain/Palin candidacy was soundly defeated. These clueless duo are still fighting that election everyday--for Palin always viciously, using Obama's race as the anchor though she may deny that. It is also Obama's race that fuels Palin's support among her fellow travellers. That is one of the reasons Palin would never rise to the challenge of her higher self. American people are smart enough to know that she is not a Presidential material. She is not qualified to occupy any national political office of significance let alone the highest office in the land. Her almost daily tantrums questioning Obama's qualification makes her even a more pitiable figure. I don't think Obama goes to sleep worrying about Palin. Who cares about Palin the quitter? World leaders openly priase Obama's performance cf. Bush.

Dr. Sam of CA 3:09PM June 10, 2010

Palin put all her chips on the space marked "Prolife's Ban Abortion Threat to Taxpayers." She thought it said "Prolife Benefits Taxpayers" but it hurts us every time a religious poor unwed mom gives birth & turns to us for welfare, food stamps, health care, ADC & subsidized housing. It costs $500,000 to support one mom-kid pair to age l8. We must hire people to deliver those benefits. Those extra people are part of Big Government. There's a huge crisis over teenage employment & not just minorities. Prolife made women bear lots of children. They now compete for jobs against their own parents & siblings. In 1973, Roe v Wade forced the civil government to stop enforcing church law that bans abortion. But it still enforces church law banning suicide. Church laws banning abortion & suicide exist because aborted conceptions & corpses are no longer church benefactors. If the GOP nominates Palin for the next election, there will be time to expose the damage I describe here. Prolife employers want big crowds of hungry people at factory gates, forced to work for less so they won't starve, undergo foreclosure & have zero left for retirement years.

ajura dawnveirs of CA 6:18AM June 07, 2010

That there is anyone in America who gives a hoot who she endorses spells bad news for America. Perhaps it is a manifestation of the failure of our Educational system and how it needs to be revamped.

Chakra of OK 5:36PM June 06, 2010

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement