Poll Shows Few Americans Understand Senate Filibuster Rules

January 29, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

I've argued here before that while the filibuster is today used in a radically different way than it was traditionally--far more legislation is subjected to these delaying tactics than used to be the case--part of the problem stems from public ignorance of how it works. I got some measure of confirmation from a recent Pew poll which showed that all of 26 percent of Americans know that 60 votes are required to break a Senate filibuster. Almost the same number (25 percent) think that a simple majority (51 votes, for those of you scoring at home) can break a filibuster. Seven percent of Americans think the number is 67 votes and five percent think it's 75 votes. And 37 percent had the good sense to throw up their hands and admit ignorance.

Figures like that make me glad that President Obama made a point in his State of the Union address of admonishing the GOP that if they "insist that 60 votes in the Senate are required to do any business at all in this town -- a supermajority -- then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well. " I might have liked him to spell things out a bit more explicitly, pointing out that such a blanket insistence on a supermajority is a recent development, and not in keeping with how the filibuster has been traditionally used. But I'll take it.

This isn't a partisan thing. The rise of filibuster has come at a time when control of the Senate has switched back and forth several times, so it's not the fault of one party or the other. But we've reached a point where the majority party has accountability without power, as underscored by the one in four Americans who think that 51 votes can move something through the Senate and 37 percent who just have no idea.

The same poll shows that only 32 percent of Americans realized that the health bill had passed the Senate without any Republican support. Almost as many Americans (29 percent) think that some number of GOPers voted for it (that breaks out to 13 percent who think that 5 Republicans voted for it, and 8 percent each who put the number at 10 or 20). Given the low polling numbers for both the health reform plan and the Republican Party, I'm not sure what to make of this stat, but it's interesting.

Tags:
Senate,
polls,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Hey! I've saved your site because you have so great posts here and I would like to read some more^^

calculatormortgagee of VA 7:14AM January 23, 2012

Nice dispatch and this enter helped me alot in my college assignement. Say thank you you seeking your information.

WP Themes of AL 9:33AM February 20, 2010

The problem of the required super-majority in the Senate is multiplied for Democrats/liberals/Progressives by the way the Senate is constituted, 2 for each state and what the two parties want to do. Because Republicans?conservatives dominate in small rural states they gain a meaningful statistical edge in the Senate and the electoral college. With the Brown election the 41 Republican Senators only represent 35% of US population. A new poll indicates the 10 reddest states, they have 15,000,000 people. Thats 20 votes in the Senate representing 5% of the population. Also since conservatives can generally achieve their goals by "starving government" and cutting taxes they don't need a 60 vote super-majority, they can do that using reconciliation as they did with the Bush tax cuts. This means that a republican president with 50 votes in the Senate (that perhaps represent around 42% of Americans can get what they want passed.

Republicans have this built in edge with or without the filibuster. Karl Rove figured this out and got Bush elected in 2000. Without the votes in the electoral college represented by the Senate Gore would have won by 17 votes in the electoral college. With a Supreme Court split 5 to 4 because of a presidential election tilted to the right caused by an electoral college tilted right because of the way seats in the senate are tilted to the right is it a surprise that real change is hamstrung by reactionary's and that as a result the nation is drifting.

paulorandall of IL 12:34PM February 02, 2010

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement