10 Questions About the Supreme Court Ruling on Campaign Finance

January 22, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (16)

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Like many on the left side of the philosophical spectrum, I was taken aback at the Supreme Court's ruling this week in Citizens United v. FEC. Who knew that corporations were entitled to the same right to free speech that individual citizens are? I had heard phrases about corporate citizenship, of course, and being "good corporate citizens," but I had no idea that the five justices in the court's "precedent? We don't need no stinking precedent" bloc took it so literally.

But after further thought, I for one welcome our new corporate countrymen. I just have a few questions about which other rights and obligations of citizenship the court might want to grant corporations:

  • Do corporations have an individual right to bear arms? I mean other than Blackwater.
  • Will corporations now be counted in the Census for purposes of Congressional reapportionment and redistricting? If so, they're going to need a lot more seats for the Delaware delegation.
  • Do corporations have a right to vote? If so, must they have been in operation for at least 18 years? If so, sorry Google.
  • Must foreign-owned corporations get work visas before doing business in this country?
  • Do corporations have the right to an abortion? (Is that what happened to Conan O'Brien's TV show?)
  • Must corporations register for the Selective Service?
  • Are corporations led by same-sex-CEOs allowed to merge? Or is that only legal in Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Iowa?
  • At age 65, do corporations become eligible for Social Security and Medicare?
  • Would corporations be eligible for healthcare under the Obamacare plan? (Was the auto bailout the corporate equivalent of the public option?)
  • Finally: Are corporations now eligible for nomination to the Supreme Court?

In fairness I should note that all of these questions apply to unions as well. It's truly a brave new world into which these "conservative" jurists are leading us.

 

Tags:
fundraising,
campaigns,
politics,
Supreme Court

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I have to say, every time I come to www.usnews.com you have another fascinating post up. One of my friends was telling me about this topic a few weeks ago. I think I'll e-mail my friend the url here and see what they say.

Coach Designer Purses of AL 5:16PM April 04, 2010

No one has mentioned the fact that many of the stock holders of these coportations are not citizens of the USA! China ownes most of the corportions...

Phillis Perry of NJ 3:47PM January 25, 2010

Corporations already have too much power, which is why this bothers me, on the other hand, I hate going against anybody's right to speak. I could be content to accept this ruling, if in trade, we made lobbying illegal. Lobbying is like bribing our representatives - let us see the same "advertising" that our representatives see.

Andy Glasser of GA 12:48PM January 25, 2010

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement