Republicans Become Party of Slow (Rhymes With No) on Healthcare

July 21, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Is Alex Castellanos this healthcare reform debate's version of Bill Kristol? As I noted yesterday, Kristol dusted off his greatest hits by advising Republicans to unrepentantly move to kill Obama's healthcare reform plan. While that's not surprising his frothing-at-the-mouth tone was arresting: He warned GOPers against trying to appear "constructive, or at least responsible." (I love that--he's not warning against being constructive and/or responsible, but against even trying to look it.) Republicans should, Kristol wrote, kill healthcare reform without being tempted to present an alternate vision.

Castellanos, the veteran GOP operative who doubles as a CNN analyst, wrote a memo to fellow Republican strategists regarding how to approach the healthcare debate, The Washington Post's Dana Milbank reports today. Castellanos' involves the GOP trying to appear ... constructive, or at least responsible.

Castellanos writes:

Cost is driving this debate.

We cannot compete with their cause v. our policies. We must compete with their cause v. our cause.

Our cause must be about what is driving this debate as well. Our cause must also be bringing down health care costs.

(The Post put his full memo online.)

He goes on to say that the GOP should paint Obama as being a tool of Washington, while the GOP wants to empower patients with their alternative. His "Key Message Point" is "SLOW DOWN the OBAMA EXPERIMENT WITH OUR HEALTH." (He really likes his boldfacing.)

So in the one corner we've got Kristol preaching wild-eyed obstinacy and in other Castellanos favoring earnest, slow-it-down opposition. Who wins? As Milbank details in his column, Michael Steele's National Press Club speech Monday was lifted almost word-for-word from the Castellanos memo. And that approach actually makes more sense. Why embrace the "party of no" label when you can act as the "party of slow" and at least appear constructive and/or responsible?

Tags:
William Kristol,
healthcare,
healthcare reform,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

People need to understand that tort reform impacts healthcare, and the economy, much deeper than is often touted. An amazing amount of infrastructure (policies, people and procedures) are added to hospitals and doctors offices all in the effort to avoid a lawsuit. Keep in mind, not just malpractice, but accidental injury on premises and human resource oriented lawsuits. This presents a facility/doctor with an amazing amount of red tape above and beyond government regulation compliance programs at the state and federal level.

Add to this that medical oriented businesses (pharmaceutical, medical device, consulting, etc) all face similar threats which create a financial strain and you'll start to see just how quickly this all adds up.

Our overly litigious society is what drags the economy down. It is not sustainable and gets worse as new and innovative ways to sue businesses come into being.

If not fixed, you can socialize anything you want ... but whatever isn't run by the government will be the next fixation of the legal locust swarm and it will die too.

RJS of TX 9:23AM July 24, 2009

Do any of you look at the larger picture? Yes our health care system needs some adjustments to it, Not scrapped and started over for costly option. Try looking up Newt Gingrich and his plan.

To Brian M. of MA

The actual Law Suits themselves account for 1% but the problem is the unnecessary testing done now to prevent lawsuits, factor that into the equation and you now have over 10% of your cost accounted for.

To Muser of NM

To sit here and say Democrats aren't for big business is the height of ignorance! I will not disagree Republicans probably have an ulterior motive for trying to stop Health Care RamRod, But Tell me how much Al Gore and GE stand to gain from Cap & Trade (I know health care is the issue here but my point is Both Democrats and Republicans don't do anything till they make sure they are compensated before pushing it through.)

Jacksmith of TX

Wow, So even though USA develops, tests, and produce more prescriptions drugs than anybody, The US is a public Disgrace, You can't have your cake and eat it to. The cost of R & D for these new and innovative drugs, procedures and equipment, is paid for by our premiums. I find it funny that you want to effectively either kill all R & D or now have the taxpayers pay for it,

Rach Y of CA

Sorry but I believe when 86% of people who have insurance are happy with their coverage there is not as bad a crisis as people make it out to be. We need to try to fix our existing system before we completely scrap it for an experimental policy when the country is broke as it is. The fact that 50 million are uninsured tells me a couple of things, that parents do not think their kids health as important that they have the nicest shoes and clothes from the mall, their hair and nail appointments, big screens, satellite TV, gas guzzling SUV's, and worst of all cigarettes and alcohol (I have compassion for people, but not people who would rather live an up-scale life style than prioritize for their children’s sake). It also tells me that we have a lot of healthy people already who do not but health insurance because they think they are healthy enough already, (your 25 to 35 crowd) And lastly if Illegal Immigrants are counted for in that 50 million then I am being purposely deceived.

Chuck of CO

If you believe anybody in Washington (Republican or Democrat) right now has your best interest at heart, then I would love to play poker with you or maybe we can talk about some nice beach front property I own in Arizona.

Bottom Line is this your government cares about your vote only, nothing more (Except our tax dollars) Health Care could have been presented in the form of modifications and when that didn't work then try to Nationalize health care. You don't make policy for the few who are the exception to the rule. You make it for the good of the people, not for the good of a person.

Ymerej of SC 3:50PM July 22, 2009

I thought healthcare started with Teddy but you could be right.

The GOP initially kept pushing the that old plan they had but I see that stopped. I notice they didn't pass the plan while they were in control but suddenly it is what we need.

I wish Obama well. Even if it doesn't pass I can say he gave it one heck of a try. And he's doing it for us since he has great health care for life.

Chuck of CO 1:52AM July 22, 2009

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement