Athletes Like Tiger Woods Are Right to Keep Out of Politics

July 2, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Jack made a good point this morning about the Tiger Woods-Jim Brown squabble. (Squabble? Has El Tigre actually said anything? Can you have a one-sided squabble?) Brown thinks Woods needs to do more in a social activism sense, and by do more he means speak up—be vocal, take a controversial stand (presumably safe stands are not what he's talking about), get in people's faces. (Be, in other words, Jim Brown.) As Jack (and, in the Post, Michael Wilbon) points out, Woods has made huge contributions—substantive and symbolic—to disadvantaged kids.

But beyond Woods's actual contributions lies the question of whether it makes sense for him to start weighing in vocally on political or social justice issues. And more broadly whether it makes sense for any athlete (or other kind of entertainer) to do so. And there are pretty good reasons for Tiger to keep his political views to himself. As Mike Florio of ProFootballTalk (now with peacock feathers!) opined last week:

...one thing we've gradually learned over time is that nearly all of you prefer this site to be apolitical, since you follow sports as a diversion from the red state/blue state stuff.

So maybe that's why Tiger Woods javascript:openWindow("and Michael Jordan have focused when in public only on those things that the public pays them to do.  When we want a fix of politics, we each know where to find it.  When we want to get away from that crap (and, in many cases, it is indeed crap), we turn to sports.

Athletes, especially big stars, who stray into politics risk their livelihoods because they risk annoying some large segment of their fan base who either disagree with their politics or are annoyed that politics is intruding upon their entertainment. (Lesser stars, this Jets fan adds, apparently have more leeway in this regard—of course the beauty, and horror, of the information age is that not only is everyone entitled to their opinion, but everyone is entitled to everyone else's opinion and people can sink or swim on the merits of their argument.)

Tags:
Tiger Woods,
golf,
politics,
sports

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

We need reconciliators as well as confrontors. Tiger is someone that brings us together. That is why America voted for President Obama as well.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

SALLY of VA 5:32PM July 17, 2009

Tiger has his opinions, just like anybody else, but he stays away because that is not what he does. He is a golfing great and sticks to his profession.

The trouble with our society today is that people tend to stick their noses into places where they don't belong. Who cares if Tiger is a rep or dem. He is one of the greatest golfers in the world.

Nothing makes me more mad than some celebrity sticking their nose into the political scene. Leave that to the talking heads on the liberal controled media.

Pat of MN 11:14AM July 04, 2009

Just for a laugh - wouldn't it be funny if Tiger was a Republican - they really wouldn't want him to speak up. What most of America wants is not to have politics shoved down our throats. The media and Hollywood really are more liberal than most Americans, and it hacks many of us to see the condescending attitude from people who have made money off of our interest in their art or sport or whatever - thinking we are a bunch of idiots that need eduction on how to think.

What is appealing about Tiger is that he acts on his convictions and doesn't just talk about them. Injustice must always be addressed, but eventually most Americans want there to be no division between the races. We need reconciliators as well as confrontors. Tiger is someone that brings us together. That is why America voted for President Obama as well.

Judy of TX 12:10AM July 03, 2009

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement