Lieberman Shows Democrats Don’t Have 60 Healthcare Votes

July 1, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

I wrote earlier noting that the imminent arrival of Sen. Al Franken does not mean that the Democrats will be able to start running amok in Washington because the Senate Democratic caucus covers a relatively broad ideological spectrum. CQ's David Nather makes the same point, using a fresh Joe Lieberman interview to underscore the point. Lieberman told the New Haven Independent that he is "skeptical" of a public option in healthcare. Remember that all it takes is one member to puncture the "filibuster-proof majority."

And as Nather points out, this lesson seems to be lost on the Democrats' base:

"Let's do what the American people have asked Democrats to do, and let's not use any excuses like this 60-vote nonsense, which is now obviously no longer an issue," Markos Moulitsas, founder of the Daily Kos, said on MSNBC yesterday.

Sure, the statement proves Moulitsas doesn't really understand the Senate. But there are lots of people who will agree with him. Until now, Democrats have used their lack of 60 votes to explain why they have to make concessions to Republicans in the Senate. Now, it's going to be a lot harder to explain any concessions—even though there will be times when they still have to make them.

Forget a filibuster-proof majority. How about a Lieberman-proof majority?

Tags:
Senate,
Joe Lieberman,
healthcare reform,
Congress,
democratic party,
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Boehner read excerpts from the 3 AM amendment so that at least a few of us would have some idea of the provisions in this bill and how much more government intrusion we will have in our lives as a result. I saw a couple of pundits asking one of the Democrats, "Did you read the bill?" "As best we could," he responded.

Our so-called leaders are voting for and against measures without having any idea of their true content.

Additionally, they're pushing these Draconian measures while responding with denial to new scientific data which controvert their objectives. Selective memory is alive and well on the left.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10274412-38.html

Goldie of AL 4:30PM July 01, 2009

He is no friend of the Democrats. He used to be one - but that ended when he sided with the neo-cons on every overseas issue during the Bush years. He was kept around to supposedly help with the majority - but that has proven to be a joke.

The voters in his state must like his neo-con buddies and appreciated his constant tailing of McCain during the last election.

I'd count on Olympia Snow before I'd count on Liebermann. She is honest about being a moderate Republican, and votes on the issues - not just based on party rhetoric and payoffs....

Dorfy of SC 3:28PM July 01, 2009

is that 55 or so Dem Senators need to FORCE one real filibuster at the first "threat".

Lieberman and 40 Republicans will make a grand sight on TV night after night after night reading the phone books from the Senate podium--or whatever you do for endless speeching. The filibuster thing is an empty threat. One and it's done.

Muser of NM 3:19PM July 01, 2009

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters. E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement