Torture Is Not Conservative? Well Yeah, Torture Really Is Not Conservative

Torture means government overreach and immorality. Yeah, that isn't conservative.

By SHARE

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Neo-con Ken Adelman has an interesting and admirable blog post over at one of Foreign Policy's blogs. He makes a conservative case against torture.

It's somewhat outrageous for real conservatives not to be outraged by all this. Conservatism has never been, and should not become now, the pro-torture movement.

He cites the core of conservatism: limited government.

The conservatism of Goldwater, like all American conservatism, stressed limited government -- not only in programs and budgets, but also in the power and reach of the state.

That's old-con. There are also, he points out, neo-con reasons to be against torture:

Neo-conservatism meant -- to me, at least -- that there is and should be a moral element at the center of foreign policy. ... Torture is not only immoral; it's not conservative. And conservatives shouldn't be defending it.

Oh yeah, that was an element of neo-conservatism, wasn't it?

Anyway, the whole post is worth reading.

Check out our political cartoons.