Obama at 100 Days Is Average in Polls, Better Than Bush, Worse Than Reagan, JFK

April 29, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Have you heard the one about how Barack Obama is one of the least popular modern presidents—less popular even than the villainous George W. Bush? There are a couple of big problems with the assertion: First, it's nonsense, second it's meaningless.

First regarding veracity: The Washington Times ran an editorial Tuesday gleefully skewering Obama as being "in the basement" popularity-wise:

President Obama's media cheerleaders are hailing how loved he is. But at the 100-day mark of his presidency, Mr. Obama is the second-least-popular president in 40 years.

They go on to list the Gallup approval ratings for the presidents since 1969 when, they say, "Gallup began tracking this." I'm not sure what "this" is, because Gallup has tracked presidential approval since FDR. In any case, from Nixon forward, the Times argues, only Bill Clinton (55 percent approval) has scored lower ratings. They peg Obama's approval rating at 56 percent. There's only one problem: Gallup put out a release today (the 100th day) pegging the president's approval rating at 65 percent. Oops.

Maybe the Times transposed the numbers? Well, no. The poll it cites gives not a straight approve/disapprove figure but breaks the answers down with greater granularity, including "just okay" (23 percent). The figures to which the Times compare it (and the one released by Gallup today) are straight approve/disapproves, without the muddled middle.

So here, using Gallup figures compiled by the invaluable American Presidency Project at U.C.-Santa Barbara and the most recent release, are the presidents since Eisenhower, in order of "100-day" popularity:

President

Approve

Disapprove

John F. Kennedy 83% 5%
Dwight Eisenhower 73% 10%
Ronald Reagan 68% 21%
Barack Obama 65% 29%
Jimmy Carter 63% 18%
Richard Nixon 62% 15%
George W. Bush 62% 29%
George H.W. Bush 56% 22%
Bill Clinton 55% 29%

 

FDR is not included because Gallup's earliest figures date to well after his 100 days; Truman, Johnson, and Ford were omitted for not having their 100 days come after being elected as president. (For the record, a month after his 100th day in office, Truman's approval rating was 91 percent; at around his 100th day, LBJ sat at around 77 percent; and Gerald Ford, whose initial 70 percent approval rating plummeted after he pardoned Nixon, was at around 48 percent when he reached the synthetic milestone.)

Anyway, the point is that after 100 days, Obama is not one of the least popular presidents in history (and no, he's not less popular than George W. Bush). He's pretty much where you'd expect a president to be at 100 days. Which gets to my second point: Like the broader 100 days benchmarking exercise, poring over approval data right now has little present-day value. There's simply too much that will happen in the next 1,000 days for this to be meaningful. (Also consider the spread of opinion polls currently available; if you're a conservative you feel pretty good about Rasmussen and Marist each giving him 55 percent approval while if you're a liberal you put much more stock in CBS News/New York Times and ABC News/Washington Post , which give him 68 percent and 69 percent respectively.)

Now, Obama has gotten a lot of press for being very popular. Is this because the press is in love with him or part of a liberal media cabal to fool people into thinking they like him? No. It's because 65 percent approval is high (even if it shouldn't be unexpected). And add to that that he has gotten off to a fast start (for better or worse).

Check out our political cartoons.

Tags:
Barack Obama,
Obama administration,
polls

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

jfk was murdered and obama wont b

jfk was a shitty president

jhfoi of AK 5:04AM May 19, 2009

Polls can ask 500 people one day and a different 500 the next and get a completely diferent outcome.

I never rely on polls. So many opinions.

One thing is Obama has saturated the airways with speeches and news conferences and town meetings all over the world and wasting at least $300,000 per day just in using AF1 stateside, so i have an opinion that he needs to stay in the oval office and do internet briefings and such.

No need to spend $300,000 just to fire up AF1 during this bad economy.

The questions in his news conference tonight meant nothing and at times he stuttered so many times, i did not understand what he meant.

In closing, Polls mean nothing. Watch the real thing

and don't rely on saturation of this man in the media.

Don of TN 9:26PM April 29, 2009

Keep in mind the current state of politics, where Bush left office with around 30% approval despite foreign policy and image being in shambles, terrorism and nuclear proliferation on the rise, the second worst economic collapse in US history, two ongoing wars and a total erosion of the Constitution and personal privacy... to name a few issues.

I don't ever expect that 30% to ever support a Democrat, even it it was Ronald Reagan incarnate.

Rory of GA 5:07PM April 29, 2009

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement