Eric Holder Was Correct on D.C. Voting Rights and the Office of Legal Counsel

April 2, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

The news that Attorney General Eric Holder sought other advice regarding the D.C. voting rights bill after his Office of Legal Counsel said the bill was not constitutional brings mixed feelings. On one hand, the notion of the AG taking such an unusual step is disturbing. On the other, I want the bill to pass and clear the constitutional barrier.

It may not be constitutional, but the Office of Legal Counsel is, the last time I checked, not the ultimate arbiter on that score, which is why I'm not ready to throw Holder under the bus as being a Bush-like politicizer of Justice. (That and his exoneration of Ted Stevens.)

Marc Ambinder has a smart post delineating the differences between the Holder DOJ and Bush DOJ. And I would add two things: First, there is a difference between, on the one hand, listening to OLC advice and ignoring it, and, on the other hand, pressuring the OLC to reach specific conclusions in the first place (thus obviating the need to find other advice). One way acknowledges differences of opinion, the other attempts to quash them. It's a small difference, but not an unimportant one.

Second, as I said above, the OLC is not the Supreme Court. Its opinions are not legally binding and it works for the attorney general—not vice versa. He knows the law as well, and in a case that really is not clear cut either way (the American Bar Association and conservative luminaries say it passes constitutional muster, the Congressional Research Service and the OLC say it doesn't), it's his prerogative to seek other counsel.

If the bill passes, the Supreme Court will get its crack at it, and Holder won't be able to ignore the justices—and that's the way the system should work.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
Eric Holder,
voting,
Washington, DC

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The leftist power machine in Washington has decided to take away a provision of our Constitution - Art. 1, sec. 2 which clearly says States have the right to representatives in the House. States, not districts, not possessions, just States.

If they get away with eliminating this provision, which one will they take away from us next? Americans should be very concerned about losing any part of our Constitution without a fight. Those who vote for this bill should be impeached.

Tony Petros of CT 8:52AM May 10, 2009

Why do you think Bush pressured the OLC? Why would he have to? The head of the OLC is a political appointee, and John Yoo, the lower-down lawyer who wrote the memo, had an expansive view of executive power without needing pressure. I've never heard that the White House used promises or threats with them.

The opposition to the torture memo was from, I gather, some of the civil service attorneys at the OLC. I don't see why their opinions should get higher weight than that of a Berkeley professor on leave in their office.

Eric Rasmusen of IN 10:01PM April 09, 2009

Given this administrations penchant for NEWSPEAK vocabulary, I don't see why they don't just rename the Voting Rights bill to FREEDOM ACT FOR AMERICANS and allow district residents to wherever they please/whenevr they please. With no deadlines or boundaries, residents could vote for any president or senator past or present. After all, EVERY VOTE MUST COUNT.

VoteNot of MD 10:48AM April 03, 2009

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters. E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement