Obama Now Owns GM? Not Quite—and Not Quite a Bad Thing

March 30, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

A number of bloggers have suggested that now Obama "owns" the auto industry—if it fails, blame will now accrue to him. This is neither necessarily true nor necessarily a bad thing.

Mickey Kaus was, I think, the first (emphasis his):

After visibly defenstrating [sic] G.M. CEO Rick Wagoner, and moving to replace the board of directors, won't Obama now "own" the G.M. problem? If the company shuts down in the near future, costing tens of thousands of blue collar jobs, it will be under executives implicitly or explicitly chosen by Obama. It will be Obama's failure, not simply G.M.'s failure, no? A public sector failure, not just a business failure. Doesn't that make it harder, not easier, for the administration to walk away and force the company into bankruptcy (if, for example, the company's plans for "viability" continue to fall short after the new 60-day deadline)?

The ownership question is debatable: GM left to its own devices would certainly fail. I don't think anyone debates that. So Obama cannot fairly be blamed for GM going under—it's not like the auto industry was chugging along nicely and that awful Obama suddenly stuck government into it just for kicks (though given some of the breathless commentary on the right, you might think that that's exactly what happened).

That said, if GM goes down, he would be left holding the bag on having wasted huge amounts of public money on a hopeless (and unpopular) cause. He'd own that for sure. But that's not a reason not to do it. If GM goes down, Obama can say he tried and people can judge whether it was worth the effort and whether his effort was well-conceived—that's responsibility, and it's better than letting GM fail for fear that if you tried to do something you may not succeed.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
government intervention,
General Motors,
Obama administration,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Nice post, thanks for writing!

seolace of AL 9:46PM May 05, 2010

subprime cycle said chemistrya palm wise shifting hockly novartis esmaili chen

Buy Ambien of AL 7:51AM April 05, 2010

There are a couple problems with this. The first is the fact that if GM does go under I dont believe Obama will own up to it, I'm sure he will just pass the blame to one of his many hench men. Second and more important by GM would have fail anyway, true. However with the government taking control it will be sure to fail as well. The government has never produced a profit off of any business they tried to intereven with etc. postal, transportation by train, transportation by boat,... soon automotive.

Trevor Laky of AZ 2:29AM June 02, 2009

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

No White Knight to Save Republicans

The GOP is stuck with Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, or Paul.

Mary Kate Cary

Politics 101 for the GOP

Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and the rest of the GOP pack are not so far apart.

Latest Video

advertisement