The Drinking Age Debate: Time to Go From 21 to 18, But It's Not an Easy Call

February 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (111)

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

60 Minutes had an interesting piece last night looking at the debate over whether or not to lower the drinking age from 21 to 18. I guess I must be getting old as I viewed the scenes of college students trying to drink themselves to death with bemusement rather than the enthusiasm I would have undoubtedly exhibited at their age (and for several years thereafter).

You can watch the full piece here:

 

 

The debate has special resonance for me because the leading proponent of lowering the drinking age is John McCardell, who was president of Middlebury College when I was an undergrad there—I like to joke with my undergrad buddies that we are in some small way responsible for his view that the current drinking age has promoted a culture of secret, binge drinking.

McCardell and Laura Dean-Mooney, national president of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, squared off on this topic in our pages last fall. Both sides make strong arguments, but I still haven't gotten a satisfactory answer to this objection to the 21 law: How can we as a society say that 18-year-olds are old enough to kill or die in the armed forces, participate in the course of the nation in the voting booth, judge their peers in a jury, and, yes, operate automobiles ... but that they are insufficiently mature to take a drink. (I wonder, by the way, if the driving age shouldn't be increased from 16ish depending on state to 18.)

McCardell makes an interesting suggestion in the 60 Minutes piece that I hadn't heard before: Teenagers should be educated about booze and its effects before they can legally take a drink.

There are larger issues we need to address as a society regardless of what happens regarding the drinking age. First, alcohol education starts at home: Parents are the first line of education when it comes to liquor and how teens deal with alcohol will reflect at least in part how it is regarded at home. More broadly, as Maureen Ogle, author of a history of beer, wrote in this space in December, this country still has a prohibition hangover. We repealed the prohibition laws but still treat booze like it ought to be illegal.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
food and drink

Reader Comments Read all comments (111)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Everyone hears about the bad in drinking. I'll tell you my experiences:

I have met many new friends, I have made fun memories, and I will have many stories to tell from my underage partying days. I have NEVER drunk and drove, took advantage of a woman, gotten into a fight, or hurt someone feelings while being under the influence... and I NEVER will.

There are many responsible underage drinkers like me out there. I am currently 19 years old, a member of the US Air Force. I have missed out on many things my base has offered. For example: Beer Pong Tournaments, Poker Nights, Sporting Events, etc. I am not saying that I need alcohol to have fun, but it many cases it adds so much more to the event. Age should not be the concern, maturity should!

Recently, a 22 year old acquaintance of mine, got into a drunk driving accident, killing one of his friends, and severely injuring the other two. So, how does someone think that once a person turns 21, they will AUTOMATICALLY make better choices than what they did the day before?

My Plan: Lower the drinking age. Those who abuse it for its unintended purposes, punish them and make them wait until they've shown they can be responsible. Drinking should be a privilege, not a right. Thank you.

Seth of MT 3:13PM October 20, 2012

want to help lower the legal drinking age? visit http://t.co/XZwt5saS to sign the petition I made on www.whitehouse.gov . it takes less than 5 minutes. let's use the right given to us in the 1st amendment

Parker of FL 9:26AM April 16, 2012

The legal drinking age is irrelevant. The problem in this country is the attitude we have towards alcohol, the attitude parents are instilling in their children. I'm under 21 and I've never drank alcohol - I made this choice because I know it is illegal to drink, but I know I'm one of very, very, very few people who do. Like most other illegal things, people who want it badly enough are going to do it no matter the consequences or difficulties.

The only friend I have who I know will never, ever become an alcoholic, has been drinking since she was ten. Her family has wine with dinner on occasion, or champagne on a holiday. She grew up with it, so her attitude towards alcohol is how most people should view sugar - it's great, in very small doses, but too much will make you sick.

Alcohol - makes you act differently (drunk); makes you sick if you have too much (hangover); can cause health problems if you do so regularly (alcoholism, liver problems, etc)

Sugar - makes you act differently (hyper/sugar high); makes you sick if you have too much (stomach ache); can cause health problems if you do so regularly (obesity, diabetes, etc)

And don't even think that someone should put an age limit on eating sugar - that's just inane.

Mya of OH 11:35PM June 25, 2011

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of "White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters." E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement