Obama Looks Like Bush on National Security Secrecy Argument

February 10, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Bad news today for people who were hoping that Barack Obama would roll back some of the imperial executive which Bush, Cheney and their wacky legal theorists built over the last eight years. The new administration's lawyers picked up a questionable legal theory from the old administration, that national security trumps due process of law.

The issue came up Monday in a court case where five former detainees are suing for Boeing helping with the Bush administration's "extraordinary rendition" program. The Bush administration had argued that the case should be dismissed because, as today's New York Times puts it, "even discussing it in court could threaten national security and relations with other nations."

Candidate Obama was rather critical of extraordinary renditions. So the judges hearing the case on Monday were a bit taken aback when governmental lawyer Douglas Letter declined an opportunity to change the government's argument in the case.

The charitable interpretation here is: Obama and his aides don't want to appear dangerously hasty while dismantling the Bush national security apparatus. They're doing their due diligence before rolling some of this stuff back.

But then there's this, from the Times:

A Justice Department spokesman, Matt Miller, said the government did not comment on pending litigation, but he seemed to suggest that Mr. Obama would invoke the privilege more sparingly than its predecessor.

"It is the policy of this administration to invoke the state secrets privilege only when necessary and in the most appropriate cases," he said, adding that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. had asked for a review of pending cases in which the government had previously asserted a state secret privilege.

I'm going to use these presidential powers less is a distinctly different thing than These "powers" were an over-reach and should be rolled back. Presidents don't as a rule relinquish powers grabbed by their predecessors, so it would not be a surprise if Obama and his team assume the first position. But it would be a disappointment.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
Obama administration,
national security terrorism and the military

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

BLAH BLAH BLAH

Back it up?

Based on what? Your non informed elbow? I don't get it? How ....ya know what...I can't even say anything....Just look at our....chhhaaa

Its not even worth this many lines of type...but GET OVER YOURSELF AND LOOK AT NATIONAL SECURITY MONITORING WHAT I"M TYPING RIGHT NOW!

Excerising freedom of speech should not be monitored....how is that securing the innocent?

And wasn't it said "It is the policy of this administration to invoke the state secrets privilege only when necessary and in the most appropriate cases,"

That's not what the bush administration did

lola of HI 12:47AM February 11, 2009

I'd even say Obama is sticking to the Bush plan because BUSH made it critical to our national security. Anyone who thinks otherwise (like the first commenter) does not know how to think, plus it's obvious Rush Limbaugh thinks for him. If you don't know how to think, please don't vote!

miles of NJ 10:05PM February 10, 2009

get over yourself. He's sticking to the Bush plan because it was critical to our national security.

liz of NY 3:55PM February 10, 2009

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters. E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement