Republican Party and Religious Right Heading for a Split?

February 6, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

The religious right might be souring on the GOP. That's the news out of a fascinating interview my colleague Dan Gilgoff has with Family Research Council chief Tony Perkins over at his God & Country blog.

Perkins told Dan that social conservatives are not going to chase the GOP, and that the party has to actively woo them.

The change is that social conservatives are still committed to the issues and still involved in the political process, but don't see the GOP as the only means to affect things in this culture. And to the degree that the party is not moving with them, they are not going to move with it. There is not the strong connection to the Republican Party that there once was. I'm more representative of the younger generation and I don't have as strong allegiance to the Republican Party. And to the degree that they try to avoid the values issues and put them at the back of the bus, I don't have a lot of desire to mess around with that.

The notion that social conservatives have a "back of the bus" status with the GOP might come as news to many of us on the left, but it's actually not a new theme: Conservatives have for a long time argued that Republicans talk the talk at election time to get votes, but are insufficiently committed when it comes to actual policies. (Really? Tell that to, for example, gays who want to marry.)

But this also illustrates the broader dilemma facing Republicans right now: For what do they stand? The tensions between the various conservative coalition members were easier to smooth over when the movement was ascendant, but there's nothing like unceremoniously getting kicked into the wilderness to exacerbate tensions. Having to map a route back to power means having to resolve the differences inherent in the minimal government portion of the party—cut taxes and don't regulate things—and the religious conservatives who are less wary of using government provided it's a means to God's ends.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
conservatives,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

im tired of the religious people in my party. they always conflict with the people like me who want smaller government and concervative fiscal policy while they just want to make the government bigger to enforce thier own moral beliefs on others.

michael of FL 7:16PM May 16, 2011

If only this guy knew anything about anything. This split is not so much about what is going on upstate New York, as what is going on between Ron Paul/libertarians/conservatives and the Neocons. Sorry Robert, but this is much bigger than social conservative versus liberal conservative. This is more about conservative versus non-conservative. It is about the fed, it is about multinational commitments, i.e. wars and alliances. Much of this part of the party is against expanding federal power. It is an objection to moral-less capitalism. It is an objection to the mendacity of those at the top of the party. It is not religious versus secular. It is spenders versus savers. It is about the Fed. It is about morons like you, who write for Jew-S News, who don't understand what is going on. It is about our country being inundated with third world morons. It is about organic change, not about top down change, socialism and Obama. This movement has elements from the "extreme right" or "religious right" but is really too plural to be characterized as actually religious or in many ways even "right". You can be a conservative and desire equal rights for gays, be a critic but not an opponent of abortion, etc. Ron Paul is my candidate. Liberals should be careful not to oversimplify the enemy. When you oversimplify the enemy you risk being outsmarted, overpowered. Be careful about what is coming, Robert, because you're blind to it. Seek out Israel, my bro, because that might be the only place you're safe given what could be coming. Of course, if we have our way, you might not be safe there either, because no more American lives or money will be spent for Israel. : )

Anthony Platt of NY 3:21PM November 01, 2009

If only this guy knew anything about anything. This split is not so much about what is going on upstate New York, as what is going on between Ron Paul/libertarians/conservatives and the Neocons. Sorry Robert, but this is much bigger than social conservative versus liberal conservative. This is more about conservative versus non-conservative. It is about the fed, it is about multinational commitments, i.e. wars and alliances. Much of this part of the party is against expanding federal power. It is an objection to moral-less capitalism. It is an objection to the mendacity of those at the top of the party. It is not religious versus secular. It is spenders versus savers. It is about the Fed. It is about morons like you, who write for Jew-S News, who don't understand what is going on. It is about our country being inundated with third world morons. It is about organic change, not about top down change, socialism and Obama. This movement has elements from the "extreme right" or "religious right" but is really too plural to be characterized as actually religious or in many ways even "right". You can be a conservative and desire equal rights for gays, be a critic but not an opponent of abortion, etc. Ron Paul is my candidate. Liberals should be careful not to oversimplify the enemy. When you oversimplify the enemy you risk being outsmarted, overpowered. Be careful about what is coming, Robert, because you're blind to it. Seek out Israel, my bro, because that might be the only place you're safe given what could be coming. Of course, if we have our way, you might not be safe there either, because no more American lives or money will be spent for Israel. : )

Anthony Platt of NY 3:21PM November 01, 2009

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger

Robert Schlesinger is managing editor for opinion at U.S. News and World Report, overseeing all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters. E-mail him at rschlesinger@usnews.com. Follow him on Twitter: @rschles.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement