• Comment ()

Obama's 'Food Cops' Take Over School Cafeterias

September 20, 2012 RSS Feed Print
A creative peanut butter sandwich could be worth up to $25,000 for college.

In the name of protecting us from ourselves, the federal government is getting more and more involved in what we eat. Some people derisively call them the "food cops" but the threat to our historic freedom of choice is very, very real.

Students returning in September in Alexandria, Va., for example, discovered much to their surprise that they could no longer purchase peanut butter and jelly sandwiches in school cafeterias. The reason, says the National Center for Public Policy Research's Amy Ridenour, has nothing to do with fears about peanut allergies or anything reasonable. Instead the sandwiches have been banned because of concerns they will not meet new nutritional guidelines being pushed by the Obama administration.

[Read the U.S. News Debate: Should the Sale of Large Sugary Drinks Be Prohibited?]

"When the government-run schools in Alexandria opened last week, their cafeterias lacked the popular lunch staple," Ridenour wrote recently. "Students could bring their own PB&Js, but they could not buy them. And, for those kids who rely on government-supplied meals, they could only dream of choosing between crunchy and creamy and strawberry preserves or grape jelly. Now, their choices are likely between fish nuggets and chef salads."

With the President Obama-backed Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, the United States Department of Agriculture—which oversees school lunch programs—has the right "to set nutritional standards for all foods regularly sold in schools during the school day, including vending machines, the 'a la carte' lunch lines and school stores." 

The act also "provides additional funding to schools that meet updated nutritional standards for federally-subsidized lunches," and, as Ridenour put it, "Therein lies the stick that mandates the carrot."

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

On the heels of a case last year in North Carolina where a lunchroom monitor took away a meal a parent had prepared for their child on the grounds that it was unhealthy and forced the student to purchase a meal from the cafeteria instead, this new federal meals policy is encroaching on the rights of parents. Under Obama, the "food cops" want to regulate food intake, advertising, caloric content, and a host of other things concerning what children eat.

To put it simply, it's none of the government's business. Parents should decide what their children eat, not the bureaucrats and not the hoards of ivory-tower researchers currently on the federal payroll.

Today it's PB&J. Tomorrow, the government might be looking for ways to really force children to eat their brussels sprouts. And—make no mistake about it—they have the power to do it.

Tags:
Obama administration,
health,
public schools,
food and drink

Reader Comments ()

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement