• Comment (2)

Obama Should Cut the Corporate Tax Rate

May 16, 2012 RSS Feed Print

As of April 1, 2012, the United States has the highest corporate tax rate of any country in the world.

Does it have to be said that this is not a good thing? High rates chase businesses and jobs out of the country. In fact, as a new study by O'Melveny and Myers's Jonathan Sallet and Robert Rizzi found, high corporate tax rates stifle innovation and retard economic growth.

Key findings of the Rizzi-Sallet paper include:

  • The United States has continued to adhere to the policy of high corporate tax rates combined with targeted narrow tax breaks. This approach to tax policy creates substantial uncertainty regarding future policies and undermines job creation.
  • Firms facing a burdensome corporate tax rate like those in the United States are at a competitive disadvantage against their international counterparts and could potentially "fall behind in innovation and productive capacity."
  • A lower federal corporate income tax rate will lead to additional capital investment and greater productivity. This boost in earnings and capital will serve as a direct catalyst for job creation and growth.
  • Lower corporate tax rates equal a lower cost of capital while higher rates raise the cost of capital to firms. Studies have shown that companies facing high corporate tax rates will reduce a firm's capital investment.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

"Innovation has spurred American growth and economic vitality for decades," said James P. Pinkerton, cochair of the Reforming America's Tax Rates Equitably Coalition and former White House domestic policy adviser to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. "By highlighting the importance of lowered tax rates and a simplified code to innovation and its impact on economic growth, Robert Rizzi and Jonathan Sallet have made a critical contribution to the tax reform debate."

"Experts and policymakers on both sides of the aisle agree that a nation's innovative capacity is directly tied to investment, job creation and ultimately, economic growth," said Elaine Kamarck, cochair of the coalition along with Pinkerton and a former adviser to President Bill Clinton and Vice President Al Gore. "The fact that the United States must be the world leader in innovation is yet another subject on which Democratic and Republican lawmakers agree and adds to the growing number of issues related to corporate tax reform on which there is bipartisan consensus."

[Read the U.S. News debate: Is Obama's Corporate Tax Plan A Good Idea?]

Something needs to change, and quickly. If Congress fails to act, taxes will increase dramatically at the beginning of next year—including major hikes in the dividend and capital gains tax rates. While that may meet with the approval of the "soak the rich" crowd, the reality is that these tax increases in particular will be very bad for the U.S. economy and could turn anemic growth into a full blown recession.

A bipartisan consensus is developing on Capitol Hill that it's time to reduce the U.S. corporate tax rate, as long as a lower rate goes hand in hand with the reduction or outright elimination of special interest credits and loopholes that distort economic behavior. If the president is looking for a real job creation program, he might want to think about getting behind this idea.

 

Tags:
corporate taxes,
economy,
Congress,
tax deductions,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Peter , dumb question , of course he should . You only have to convince the narrow minded . Good luck .

Hunter of WI 10:37PM May 16, 2012

“Britain to Obama: More Proof that Taxing the Rich Is a Fool’s Errand”

February 22, 2012

“President Obama is insistent that taxes must go up to close the deficit. He says it’s just common sense that taxes must go up, because the math says so. But if he gets his way, the numbers won’t add up the way he says they will."

“President Obama wants to raise taxes on “the rich.” But the Treasury will never collect the revenue he says will come from such hikes, because the rich will change their behavior to escape the punitive levies”

“Case in point from Britain, where Parliament recently implemented a 50 percent tax rate on the rich:"

“The Treasury received £10.35 billion in income tax payments from those paying by self-assessment last month, a drop of £509 million compared with January 2011. Most other taxes produced higher revenues over the same period. Senior sources said that the first official figures indicated that there had been “manoeuvring” by well-off Britons to avoid the new higher rate. The figures will add to pressure on the Coalition to drop the levy amid fears it is forcing entrepreneurs to relocate abroad.”

“...Liberals understand this phenomenon when they raise taxes on cigarettes to discourage smoking, but they never seem to apply the same principle to income. If you tax income more heavily, you’ll end up with less income to tax, just like if you raise taxes on cigarettes, smokers purchase fewer packs.”

http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/22/britain-to-obama-more-proof-that-taxing-the-rich-is-a-fools-errand/

Bill Hedges of MO 1:35PM May 16, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement