• Comment (11)

Mitt Romney's Poll Surge Might Be Bigger Than It Looks

May 15, 2012 RSS Feed Print

The latest CBS News/New York Times poll shows President Barack Obama and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney in a dead heat in the race for the White House.

Given that Obama has had a relatively good week and Romney something of a bad one, this poll is a real shocker. Asked for whom they would vote were the election held today, 46 percent of the nearly 600 registered voters surveyed said Romney while 43 percent said Obama. Given that the error margin is plus or minus four points, it looks like the race is all tied up.

Actually, Romney may be in better shape than the poll suggests. The same survey conducted in April showed each man with 46 percent of the vote while the polls from March and February showed the president ahead.

What is particularly interesting is this is a poll of registered voters, meaning it's a survey representing the entire universe of those who may cast ballots in the upcoming election. Thanks to things like "motor voter," there are far more Democrats in the pool of registered voters than Republicans and, unlike surveys of so-called "likely voters," many of them may not bother to vote.  It is not too much of an inference, therefore, to think that Obama may be losing the country—and that's because he has failed to get a handle on the nation's economic troubles.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

Unemployment is down from where it had been under Obama, to 8.1 percent, but that's not because the economy is creating jobs. It's because, as this simple analysis shows, large numbers of people have simply stopped looking for work. "In April," wrote Tyler Durden on Zerohedge.com, "the number of people not in the labor force rose by a whopping 522,000 from 87,897,000 to 88,419,000," which he says is the highest number ever recorded. The labor force participation rate, meaning the people who are working or looking for work, is now at 64.3 percent, a 30-year low.

With numbers like that, with Obama having wiped out 30 years of job creation under presidents of both parties, is it any surprise that 62 percent of respondents in the CBS News/New York Times poll "cited the economy as the most important issue in the presidential election"?

"Concern over the budget deficit ranked a distant second at 11 percent, followed by health care at 9 percent. Seven percent picked same-sex marriage, 4 percent cited foreign policy and 2 percent chose immigration," according to an analysis of the numbers conducted by CBS.

The response of the White House and Obama's campaign to the numbers has been to attack the way the survey was conducted—which is really their only choice since they can't dispute what the numbers say. The president's deputy campaign manager, Stephanie Cutler, told NBC's Chuck Todd, "We can't put the methodology of that poll aside, because the methodology was significantly biased." When pressed, Cutler called the sample "biased."

[See a collection of political cartoons on Mitt Romney.]

Maybe so, but that doesn't get around the fact that 67 percent of respondents—remember these are registered voters, not likely voters—rated the condition of the national economy as either "fairly bad" or "very bad."  And 63 percent said they thought things would stay the same or get worse.

Equally disturbing for the White House, and perhaps the reason why the Obama campaign, its political allies, and its friends in the media have suddenly unleashed the attack squad against the former governor, is that this same poll found Romney leading among independents, among men and among women, 46 percent to 44 percent for the president—still within the margin of error but an indication that any bounce the Democrats might have gotten over accusations the GOP was engaged in a "war on women" has dissipated.

Team Obama needs a new strategy. It doesn't take a college degree to figure out that just about the only thing left is to try and  make Romney radioactive, which means a nasty and negative summer is in the offing. It will be interesting to see if the same journalists and Washington "deep thinkers" who call out the Republicans every time they say something uncomplimentary will be as hard on the Democrats as they "go nuclear" on Romney.

Tags:
Barack Obama,
economy,
2012 presidential election,
polls,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment was submitted successfully.
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Friend Hedges, (almost missed your blog) you are correct your source is truly biased. Guess what, the other side has "facts" and "graphs" too.

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3252

Your source only claims Obama is the reason for our economic distress, it does not prove it. You and I can agree it was many factors that caused this economic collapse that started before Obama was elected. I don't understand what it is about the phrase "GREAT recession" that people cannot comprehend. You know, as I know, it takes 2 to 4 years to recover from a mild recession. Who knows how long it will take to recover from a "GREAT recession". My feeling is the economy will continue to improve, no matter who is elected in November and whomever that will be, will take all the underserved credit, just as Obama takes all the underserved blame. I'm trying to find out how many jobs were lost before Obama's stimulus bill was implemented (Spring/Summer of 2008), but I do see job creaton since then. Did we take a huge blow? Yes. Can you directly attribute that to Obama, no. Econcomics is way to murky for that kind of "proof". I might add, the stimulus bill, much I disagreed with, did not cause unemployment, it increased the debt no doubt, but it did not create more uemployment. We have historically low tax rates right now, and they did not cause a great job creation. So, what would the Pubs have done? More tax cuts? Yawn, according to your source they have not worked.

I find it humorous to see Pub Governors touting their falling unemployment rates, but still saying Obama's economic policies are a failure. If their state economies are gettig better, should not Obama at least share in some of that credit or are the Pub Governors blowing hot air?

On side note. hope you have not been too offended by my remarks. Politics is a passion sport. We all get carried away from time to time. Please accept my apologies. I have much respect for your points of view. Just don't agree with (most) of them. Take good care.

bing of AL 8:53PM May 16, 2012

Polls at this stage of the game are meaningless.

bing of AL 8:13PM May 16, 2012

Spot on! It is bigger. check this

http://polls2012.blogspot.com/

Jim of IL 2:51PM May 16, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement