• Comment (15)

Obama Camp Attacks Koch Brothers to Distract From Healthcare Cost

April 13, 2012 RSS Feed Print

The White House and the president's re-election campaign didn't very much like a 52-page report issued this week by George Mason University's Mercatus Center that shows how President Barack Obama's healthcare reform law will bust the federal budget.

The report, "The Fiscal Consequences of the Affordable Care Act" was written by the well-regarded Charles Blahous, a public trustee of the Medicare and Social Security programs. In it Blahous showed how the new law will drive federal healthcare spending up and will add as much as a half a trillion dollars to the federal deficit over a 10-year period.

[See a collection of political cartoons on healthcare.]

Rather than try to refute the data or Blahous's conclusions, they used it as yet another opportunity to attack their favorite targets, philanthropists Charles and David Koch, because Mercatus has benefited in the past from their generosity. As ABC News's Devin Dwyer reported on the network's blog, Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt criticized it thusly: "The Koch brothers and their allied organizations first spent millions of dollars attacking the President in an attempt to maintain taxpayer subsidies for oil and gas companies that are making record profits and boosting their own bottom line. Now, they have bought and paid for a false, partisan report."

A spokesman for the Kochs, Philip Ellender, was quick to respond, saying in a release, "As has been explained repeatedly, Koch has consistently and for many years opposed government subsidies of any kind and urged the government to discontinue them.  Further, Charles Koch and David Koch have championed free-market policies for more than 50 years and criticized those policies that are counter to free-market principles, regardless of whether Democrats or Republicans were in power."

Ellender went further, adding, "The Obama campaign's complaints about energy policy appear to be a tactic to divert attention from the study's analysis of the Affordable Care Act's impact on our country's massive deficits. The fact that the President's campaign would prefer to demonize Koch rather than discuss the economic consequences of the president's policies demonstrates that the Administration and its allies would prefer not to deal with the serious economic crisis our nation faces."

[Peter Roff: The Left Sees the Koch Brothers Everywhere]

For his part Blahous is standing by his conclusions, methodology, and motives, answering his critics in a blog post at Forbes. "For the record, the research is my own and does not reflect any other person's policy agenda other than my own research interest in exploring the fiscal effects of a momentous change in law, something I was surprised to find that no one else had previously quantified."

"The paper was subject to a double-blind peer review process," Blahous added, "which means that I did not know who was reviewing the paper, and the reviewers did not know who had written it.  Prior to this formal review process, I also independently had the paper reviewed by several fellow experts in federal budgeting and health care financing to confirm that the analysis was correct."

[Read the U.S. News debate: Should the Supreme Court Overturn Obama's Healthcare Law?]

The Obama campaign likely realizes, however, that an argument over the data is an argument that does them no good. The new healthcare law is as unpopular today as it was when the president signed it into law, if not more so. Invoking the Kochs is a misdirection that allows the campaign to talk about its favorite subjects, wealth-inequality, Wall Street billionaires, unfairness, and secretive right-wing conspiracies rather than confronting the truth: The new law isn't going to work as advertized and is going to cost everyone a lot more than they were led to believe. The Kochs are not the issue and never were. Obama, the way he has governed, and the initiatives he has championed are the real issues—so it's no wonder his campaign doesn't want to talk about them.

Tags:
health care reform,
health care,
Obama administration

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Just a guess on my part, whenever an explanation given is "Obama's administration just wants to distract from Healthcare costs". Must be coming from a "republican", and even worse, a "greedy" one at that. Good luck blaming Obama for everything that beagan with your leaders 8 years ago. Your group is pathetic. Think like a real "American" instead of a "party memeber".

Keith Rogers of FL 5:44PM April 27, 2012

You could distract an ignorican with almost anything. Their gullibility and shallowness makes it easy. You could even tell them lies . In point of fact look at romney's lies about the fate of women after Bushe's recession under Obama. The treasury secretary said they were pure fiction. I don't think an ignorican can tell the difference between fiction and reality. That is why they are so anti-science, anti-progress, and anti-women. Their small-minded denial of reality explains their acceptance of a candidate for prez who is a liar, as Newt GiGrinch pointed out so eloqently. Their's is an etch-a-sketch party.

Ignoricans in Denial of CO 6:12PM April 15, 2012

This week-end you are showing your are stupid to the max.

1. brucetee _ No “duck's in a row” for you... Just crap grass in your garden...

So you claim you have “corrected” me. Being cute again ??? You _ suppositively _ prove your case by showing Prez wife worked outside the home in earlier times. You did not correct me. You confirmed what I wrote. I wrote “Ms bum-bum is no “June Cleaver” either”. Unlike June, she worked (means no Jume Cleaver). May have to call you dumb-dumb with these kind of errors...

2. You write "It bears repeating that the united states,is the only non- third world country that does not provide basic healthcare for it;s citizen's".

DEMOCRATS fixed that ???

That is a terrible thing for you to say about the __ passed legislation __ called BUMCARE. Was passed BY DEMOCRATS. DEMOCRATS had no need to read bill before passage. It provided a 4 + year wait to get it going FULL STEAM.

BAD JOB brucetee...

Bill Hedges of MO 5:51PM April 15, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement