• Comment (10)

Obama's Economy and Hilary Rosen Lead the 'War on Women'

April 12, 2012 RSS Feed Print

The president's acolytes have been working overtime to convince the American people there's a "war on women." They're right—but it's not being waged by the Republicans.

The real "war on women" is tied to the state of the U.S. economy, which is currently engaged in its most anemic recovery in the post-war period. President Obama's policies of tax, spend, and regulate have prevented business expansion, produced layoffs, and led to nearly 3 million people dropping out of the workforce. Of those, women are the hardest hit.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Is There a Republican 'War on Women'?]

Since Obama took office the nation has lost a net 740,000 jobs, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports, and unemployment had gone from 7.8 percent to as high as 10.1 percent in October 2009 before coming down to it's current rate of 8.2 percent. And that's only counting people still looking for work. Without them, it's closer to 9 or 10 percent according to various estimates.

For women the picture is even bleaker. The bureau reports that the unemployment rate for women has increased from 7 percent to 8.1 percent and the number of female employees in the workforce has declined by 683,000. The female labor force participation rate fell in March from 57.9 percent to 57.7 percent.

The president's failure to get a handle on the economy constitutes the real "war on women," depriving them of opportunities to enter or remain in the workforce. In order to divert attention from these cold, hard facts, Obama and his allies—like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democratic National Committee Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz—have tried to focus attention on the nonsensical idea that the Republicans want somehow to ban women's access to birth control.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Catholic contraception controversy.]

It must be something in polling data that is driving them to this. Going back as far as the New Hampshire GOP presidential debate in which ABC's George Stephanopoulos, a former senior Clinton White House aide, asked Governor Romney abut the subject, the Democrats have been trying to maneuver the Republicans into saying something stupid, and therefore politically useful, about stopping access to birth control.

This reduces women to sexual objects, as though it is somehow the only issue of any importance to them. It's nonsense, of course, not that many if any of the prominent so-called independent political analysts would ever bother to say so.

The latest provocation comes from longtime Washington lobbyist and television commentator Hilary Rosen—who has been variously described as an adviser to President Obama and to the Democratic National Committee—who Wednesday attacked former Massachusetts first lady Ann Romney for having "never worked a day in her life."

[Scott Galupo: The True Insult of Hilary Rosen's Ann Romney Slam]

Romney, who with her husband raised five children, responded to the attack in a dignified fashion, saying on Fox News that her career choice "was to be a mother" and suggesting Rosen "should have come to my house when those five boys were causing so much trouble. It wasn't so easy."

There have been some prominent Democrats, like senior campaign aide David Axelrod, who have tried to wall Rosen's comments back but the barn door is already open. Nevertheless this too is a fight the president's supporters want to have. It's not just about the traditional lack of respect so-called "feminists" exhibit for women who chose to remain in the home as caregivers to their children. They think they can use it to separate Ann Romney from other women who do not have the ability to stay at home and raise their children and instead have to go out and work. The problem with this meme, which was not developed by accident, is that many of those women can't find jobs because, under Obama, the economy is not creating them.

Most women, like most men, are concerned primarily about jobs, the economy, taxes, and the general direction of the country. The narrow, special interest appeals the Democrats are making based on one-sided sexual politics will not, in the long run, hold water. American women are smarter than most of these Democrats apparently give them credit for being.

Tags:
Ann Romney,
Debbie Wasserman Schultz,
economy,
Obama administration,
female voters,
Nancy Pelosi

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Peter Roff, I am surprised that a journalist with your experience and credentials would allow a brazen grammatical error to be published in such a well-crafted piece.

In the third paragraph, there is the the wrong use of "it's". My eight-year-old daughter brought home a worksheet from school just last week on this same common mistake.

Elizabeth Leigh of TX 10:09AM April 23, 2012

"Hilary Rosen—who has been variously described as an adviser to President Obama and to the Democratic National Committee—who Wednesday attacked former Massachusetts first lady Ann Romney for having "never worked a day in her life."

Attacked? That's rather strong, isn't it? And, so what? Rosen doesn't work for the Obama administration, she doesn't work for the DNC. She's a commentator for CNN for goodness sake. So, while it's interesting in a gossipy kind of way to repeat what a CNN commentator said about Anne Romney (not "attacked"), it really doesn't have anything to do with the Obama administration.

Sure, Rosen was dismissive of Ann Romney, and used inaccurate language. She should have said that Romney was never subjected to the job market or never received W-2's. Not that that would have made more palatable her implication that, as a stay-at-home parent, Romney couldn't understand the economy. Heck, Alan Greenspan, former Chairman of the Federal Reserve, went to work every day, studied the economy all day long, and yet couldn't understand the economy. Maybe a stay-at-home parent would done better. Maybe a stay-at-home mom would have known that if you lift governmental regulations from too-big-to fail financial institutions backed by the F.D.I.C., REALLY BAD THINGS HAPPEN. It wasn't rocket science. Jeez.

And, Mr. Roff, your segue from the "GOP War on Women" to the real war on women being the economy was awkward at best. Also, disingenuous as you surely must know that Republican efforts to defund and cut public sector jobs, which are disporportionately filled by women, are the true danger to women's welfare.

You write that Obama and his allies have tried to focus attention on the "nonsensical idea that the Republicans want somehow to ban women's access to birth control." Well, not really. They're trying (rather successfully, I might say) to make it clear that, through its proposed legislation, the GOP is attacking women's autonomy and trying to annex their wombs, even at the risk of endangering women's health or life.

The Republicans recently added a provision to H.R 358, the “Protect Life Act,” sponsored by Rep. Joseph Pitts (R-PA), to amend the Affordable Care Act in a way that could preclude women in life-threatening situations from receiving an abortion. Nice. This means that doctors would be prevented from performing an abortion even if a woman's life is in danger, and even if the life of the zygote, embryo or fetus was not viable. Banning birth control. Silly, Mr. Roff. If only it were just that.

Surprise of CA 7:27AM April 15, 2012

Friend Hedges, have you seen the poll numbers for House Pubs? What makes you think the public is so much more fond of the Pubs than Obama? Everybody is disgusted with everybody and with good reason. Bring on the moderates! The extremists don't solve anything. They just whine.

Friend Bruce B of NV, I found my answer: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/mitt-romney-lilly-ledbetter-act_n_1417913.html

Not sure what he'll say next week.

bing of AL 6:22PM April 13, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement