• Comment (6)

Despite Promises, Obamacare May Force You to Change Insurance

April 5, 2012 RSS Feed Print

There are many candidates from which to choose Barack Obama's "signature promise," something akin to George Herbert Walker Bush's "Read my lips. No new taxes."

Some may argue it's his guarantee unemployment would not rise above 8 percent if Congress passed his economic stimulus package. Others might suggest it's the oath he made not to hire lobbyists to work in the White House. A few even might even pick his commitment to shut down the terrorist detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. For my money, however, it's the assertion he made over and over again that anyone who liked the health insurance he or she had would be able to keep it after his reform package became law.

[See a collection of political cartoons on healthcare.]

Healthcare reform or, as it is commonly referred to, "Obamacare" is the president's most significant achievement, even if a majority of the American electorate dislike it intensely.

A recent ABC News/Washington Post poll found Americans opposing the law 52 to 41 percent, with 67 percent saying they would approve if the U.S. Supreme Court declared all or part of it unconstitutional. A CBS News/New York Times poll from late March had 47 percent of Americans disapproving of Obamacare, including 30 percent disapproving "strongly" while only 36 percent said they approved of it at all.

Part of the reason for it's lack of popularity may be that, whether intentionally or in a fit of political hubris, the president and his allies oversold the package—both while it was being debated in Congress and in the days, weeks, and months since it became law. Which brings us full circle to the "signature promise"—the part about those who liked their health insurance being able to keep it.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Should the Supreme Court Overturn Obama's Healthcare Law?]

According to this chart, prepared by The Heritage Foundation—the conservative organization that many liberals like to point out is the one that originally thought up the individual mandate—anywhere between 11 million and 35 million working Americans will lose their employer-provided health insurance coverage after the terms of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act are fully implemented.

Estimated Loss of Employer After Full Implementation of ACA

The estimates come from a variety of sources and should not, in fact, be surprising. As the new law allows employers to shift the ability to provide coverage to other entities—like the state-based exchanges Obamacare creates—they will do so. It makes perfect economic sense and is a predictable consequence, meaning people should have seen it coming and should have known that, while the new law might not force people to change their coverage—to mandate that they do so—the real world realities are such that for many people the coverage they have will cease to be offered. Someone as smart as President Obama is reputed to be would have most assuredly known that, putting his "signature promise" somewhere between insincerity and outright fabrication. The voters will determine where it comes down at election time.

Tags:
Barack Obama,
Obama administration,
Guantánamo Bay,
healthcare,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ps ... brucetee wrote "On this one you and the republicans are on the wrong side of history"...

SORRY. Polls against bumcare...

Bill Hedges of MO 8:55PM April 07, 2012

brucetee

OUR 2008 plan was not Ryan plan. bumcare covers NEARLY NOBODY AFTER ALL THESE YEARS AFTER PASSAGE...

We have had specific health plans back to time obumacare was passed with __ NO 4 YEAR + __ WAIT.

"SAME RESULTS" as bumacare ? NEVER !!! CBO says we can not afford bumcare.

When you copycat my phases place __"" __around it. As in "Silence is deafening"...

Bill Hedges of MO 8:46PM April 07, 2012

Hey there mr. bill.your so called "plan" as i pointed out is a sham.it would not cover any where near the people that the democrat's plan does.

your trying to make chicken salad,with no chicken.

even now all the repubs talk about is repeal.Some plan!

america the only non-third world country that does not provide basic healthcare for it's citizen's.

On this one you and the republicans are on the wrong side of history.

bruce b of NV 6:30PM April 07, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement