• Comment (6)

Who Is Joe Biden to Slam Mitt Romney on Russia Policy?

April 3, 2012 RSS Feed Print

No one really knows what President Barack Obama really meant when an open mic caught him telling outgoing Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he would have "more flexibility" on the issue of ballistic missile defense once the November election had come and gone.

No one knows because the president won't say. The White House downplayed the remark with a bunch of double talk but it's an important question: What's on his mind?

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

Does he have a secret plan to cast aside more than two decades of U.S. efforts to create a defensive shield against ballistic missiles? He's already pulled out of a deal with Poland and the Czech Republic to locate a forward-based defensive system in those two countries, much to the embarrassment of the United States and the chagrin of our allies. His budget for Fiscal Year 2013 tries to shift funds from missile defenses that are expected to come on line next year to a weapons system that won't be ready for deployment, in the best of all possible worlds, for almost 10 years.

Republicans were quick to pounce on the issue. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the leading candidate for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination, called Obama's comment "alarming" and suggested it was another example of the "breathtaking weakness" with which the current president had conducted U.S. foreign and defense policy.

[Ken Walsh's Washington: GOP Continues To Hammer Obama for Open Mic Comments]

This provoked an angry response from Vice President Joe Biden when he appeared on CBS's Face the Nation. "He just seems to uninformed or stuck in a Cold War mentality," Obama's No. 2 said. "It exposes how little the governor knows about foreign policy."

It is worth noting that Joe Biden served in the U.S. Senate for more than 30 years, eventually becoming chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. As far as the Cold War was concerned, he was also wrong about almost everything, especially during the Reagan years when he and his ilk in the Senate opposed almost ever measure the 40th president put forward in pursuit of ending the Cold War in a way that left America victorious.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Are Cuts to the Defense Budget Necessary?]

Biden and his friends would have preferred the United States continue to prop up the Soviet Union, pursue arms control treaties that would have left America weaker, and done nothing to stop the spread of Communism across the globe. From the Strategic Defense Initiative to aiding anti-Communist governments and guerilla movements around the world, from rebuilding the U.S. military to working with our allies in Europe to keep the Soviet's penned in, Biden was on the wrong side almost all of the time. With a record like his he has a lot of nerve attacking Romney for being naïve as far as foreign policy is concerned. If Biden had gotten his way, there would still be a Soviet Union, there would be no democracy in Eastern Europe—which would still be under the Soviet thumb—and the whole world would be the worse for it.

Tags:
Cold War,
Barack Obama,
Russia,
Joe Biden,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This article has been wrote by a fascist. Russia was never defeated by U.S. and never will be.

Sergey Popach of WA 5:57AM April 04, 2012

Peter is a moron and a dirtbag hack. Biden is irrelevant to this situation. What we do have is a presidential candidate proding Russia in a very Putin-esque manner. He's feigning outrage to Fox News morons over a non-issue -- that Obama can't negotiate missile defense in an election year. 1. Who still reads this POS yellow-rag? 2. Does anyone care what this neo-con hack has to say?

Al Dorman of MD 7:45PM April 03, 2012

This article is written by a common sense challenged Russia Policy illiterate. Additionally, the President's "Open Mic" statement is quite understandable and reasonable considering whit whom it was said and the current "Political" calendar in America. I'd say more but why? The Presidents remarks were non-specific in every way except to say "not now" and have nothing to do with VP Biden's well informed 21st century knowledge of Russia.

SBurgess of CA 3:19PM April 03, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement