• Comment (13)

Michael Bloomberg's New York Nannystate Bans Food Donations

March 20, 2012 RSS Feed Print

America is rapidly becoming a "Nannystate." In the name of protecting us from ourselves, the government at all levels is taking an active interest in what we eat, where we live, and in all kinds of decisions that seem to be best left to personal choice.

In the latest iteration of "Nannystateism," New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and the bureaucrats who work for him have now determined that no one be allowed to donate food to the city's homeless shelters on the grounds that it may be unhealthy.

It defies common sense, the idea that an empty belly is somehow healthier than one that contains trans fats, salt, or other food additives the Bloombergers have determined are not fit for human consumption.

[Joshua Gilder: Science Reporting on Organic Food is Out to Lunch.]

"In conjunction with a mayoral task force and the Health Department, the Department of Homeless Services has recently started enforcing new nutritional rules for food served at city shelters. Since DHS can't assess the nutritional content of donated food, shelters have to turn away good Samaritans," writes the National Center for Public Research's Jeff Stier in Monday's New York Post .

"A new inter-agency document controls what can be served at facilities—dictating serving sizes as well as salt, fat, and calorie contents, plus fiber minimums and condiment recommendations," Stier writes.  His research, the center said in a release, reveals that there's more to the story.

[See the U.S. News rankings of the Best Diets.]

"For over a decade, Glenn Richter and his wife Lenore have led a team of food-delivery volunteers from Ohab Zedek, the Upper West Side orthodox congregation. They've brought freshly cooked, nutrient-rich surplus foods from synagogue events to homeless facilities in the neighborhood," Stier wrote. "The practice of donating such surplus food to homeless shelters is common among houses of worship in the city."

[Richter] says the beneficiaries—many of them senior citizens recovering from drug and alcohol abuse—have always been appreciative of the treats he and other OZ members bring. It's not just that the donations offer an enjoyable addition to the 'official' low-salt fare; knowing that the food comes from volunteers and from community members warms their hearts, not just their stomachs… So you can imagine Richter's consternation last month when employees at a local shelter turned away food he brought from a bar-mitzvah.

Turning away donated food intended for the homeless is the height of left-wing, bureaucratic arrogance. By relying on the designated food servers with whom the city has contracted to feed them rather than making best use of the charitable impulses of so many of the city's citizens is an example of the outrageous disconnect that exists between the people who run the city and the people who live there. We all know what "the road to hell" is paved with and now, thanks to Mayor Bloomberg and his ilk it runs right through the middle of New York City.

Tags:
New York City,
food and drink,
Michael Bloomberg

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Mr. Roff, as dyed-in-the-wool Liberal Democrat, I have strongly disagreed with you on many occasions, such as your opinion that "...Turning away donated food intended for the homeless is the height of left-wing, bureaucratic arrogance...". However, if Mayor Bloomberg's latest caprice is about starving NYC's poor as well as the City's homeless, I believe that we can both agree that Bloomberg MUST be impeached and removed from office ASAP.

John Bryans Fontaine of CT 12:39PM May 31, 2012

Unfortunate, as my single Mother of 3 relied on such donations for our survival. I'm not sure the shelf life of the Kix cereal, powdered milk, and Spam we looked forward to dining on daily for several years, was much of a factor. Perhaps reforming the laws pertaining to child support would be a more practical first step. This could reduce the need for such programs that so many single mothers/fathers are forced to rely on to keep their children alive!

Victoria Trunzo of IL 2:15AM April 08, 2012

We have finally reached the ultimate state of being so open-minded that our brains have fallen out. I'm certain the homeless would much prefer to rummage through a dumpster than to have perfectly good food donated for their use. Politicians are useless. Leave us alone and we will be able to progress nicely without your interference.

JRJ of ID 11:30AM March 21, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement