Andrew Breitbart a Pioneer Journalist Who Stood Up to Liberal Media

Reader Comments
Back to blog

Why am I not all surprised that Bill Hedges would agree with Rush Limbaugh? I, too, heard all of Limbaugh's show that day, and it was "way over the top," even for Limbaugh, regarding this young lady's intent. I really do not get upset with Rush Limbaugh, however, because he readily admits he is a satirist and an entertainer, so his "shocking" comments are not a surprise. When a member of Limbaugh's radio audience actually stoops to agree with this extreme example of Limbaugh's satire, that is a horse of a different color.

ann keenan of MI 10:50PM March 14, 2012

"How do you determine that your links are facts?"
Simple : Either by following the links provided in the article, or by spending a few minutes searching the web until the original source is found.
The web can be a very good educational tool, IF you use it instead of just believing the the spoutings of people you happen to be on the same side of the aisle with.
Unfortunately, the majority are too lazy, or too stupid, to figure out that they are being led around by their noses - they are willingly being the proverbial "useful idiots".
And there are way too many of them around here.

enzo of IN 11:17AM March 06, 2012

enzo of IN says: "Facts supported by links..."
How do you determine that your links are facts? Since we can determine facts only by primary information, where do you get your primary information, and how do you know it is primary information?

ann keenan of MI 12:02AM March 06, 2012

Bruce:
Well, you answered my question, finally.
But not with the answer you thought you were giving.
Generic accusations count for nothing, as you should know by now. Facts supported by links so that other may view for themselves are the only legitimate means of putting forth arguments.
Without those, one has to conclude that there is no supporting data.
So, as I suspected, the only possible conclusion based on your own words and actions is that all you are doing is spouting the usual Leftie smear tactics.
Nice try, though.

enzo of IN 8:45AM March 05, 2012

let;s cut to the chase.andy breibart was nothing more than megaphone for the far right. this is born out in his speechs and writings.along with shaping facts to reflect his point of view.
SEVEN!=and counting the number of sponsors who have given rush the middle finger.
the poster who shall remain nameless doesn;t want to touch that hot potato.

bruce b of NV 11:06PM March 04, 2012

brucetee you wrote “i have sympathy for his family.as for andrew breitbart,the person.he was little more than a muckraking neocon shill.”
enzo of IN wrote “Any proof of that, or are you just repeating the standard Leftie smear tactics like your post in the Chapin "Mad Men" thread?”
Believe brucetee this is what enzo wants you to answer but YOU AVOID...

Bill Hedges of MO 10:22PM March 04, 2012

brucetee
I was responding to R Cooper of NY. Notice my comment was directed to him ? Then you stuck your nose in it. Blame R Cooper of NY not me. Don't let "facts get in the way of your bias" to blame me...

Bill Hedges of MO 10:14PM March 04, 2012

Bruce:
Again:
Still no answer to my first question?

enzo of IN 9:53PM March 04, 2012

enzo
i only was replying to what bill h. was posting,your correct, this is really not right spot for this topic.

bruce b of NV 8:48PM March 04, 2012

Bruce:
Yup, Limburger screwed up royally and is now paying for it. As he should.
But Limburger has WHAT do do with this thread?
Oh - still no answer to my first question?

enzo of IN 8:09PM March 04, 2012