• Comment (7)

Objections to Obama's Contraceptive Mandate Keep Building

February 29, 2012 RSS Feed Print

The pushback against the Obama administration's assault on religious liberty continues. Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Archbishop of New York, recently signed on to a statement explicitly rejecting the new federal mandate that employers make available, either directly or indirectly, healthcare insurance that provides for abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and other artificial contraceptives despite the dictates of the church.

In signing, Dolan joins more than 500 leading scholars, university presidents, and other academic administrators, activists, and religious leaders from a multitude of faiths in rejecting not just the mandate but President Barack Obama's so-called accommodation of religious liberty as a mere "accounting trick" that changes nothing of moral substance.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Catholic contraception controversy.]

"Not only is this an alliance of Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox Christians, Latter-Day Saints, Jews, Muslims, and others," the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty said in a release, "the list of signers includes people from across the political spectrum—liberals, conservatives, and people fitting into neither category. This is an unprecedented coming together of people to defend religious liberty and the rights of conscience against a deeply misguided and unjust governmental action."

Beckett is one of the groups pushing back using social media, a relatively new form of advocacy for groups concerned with issues related to religious liberty. Its video can be seen here. Another group weighing is Catholic Advocate, producing the video "Consultation" and calling on "people of faith" to support the federal Respect for Rights of Conscience Act, which is expected to come up for a vote in the U.S. House of Representatives some time in the near future.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Should Catholic and Other Religious Institutions Have to Cover Birth Control?]

"Some are trying hard to make this about a different issue. Make no mistake, when those in power try to rip through the fabric of what America stands for, the voices of the people unite," said Matt Smith, president of Catholic Advocate. "People of faith across the country are joining together in support of our religious liberties."

Among the points that "Consultation," the second video that Catholic Advocate has made on the subject, is that while the Obama administration failed to consult with the Catholic bishops and the leaders of other religious groups before issuing the contraceptive coverage mandate, it did make sure to bring Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider, in the loop.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

The issue is likely to continue gathering steam, but not perhaps in the way Obama's political handlers in Chicago might hope. Adding fuel to the fire is a report by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service released Tuesday indicating that, even with the illusive Obama accommodation in place, employers could still face a stiff fine if they fail to offer the required coverage. "A group health plan that fails to comply with the pertinent requirements in the IRC may be subject to a tax of $100 for each day in the noncompliance period with respect to each individual to whom such failure relates," it says.

In plain English that means a self-insuring religious charity, hospital, or Catholic school with 100 employees could be subject to a $3.65 million annual fine as the penalty for exercise it rights to religious conscience. With numbers like that at stake, this is not an issue that is going to go away quickly or quietly.

 

Tags:
Obama administration,
religion,
healthcare,
healthcare reform,
birth control

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What if another administration in the future decides world tensions are bad enough that a draft for the military is needed. Will we allow people to object for religious and moral reasons? What if a future president says no objection allowed and cites this case as precedent?

TexasGuy of TX 6:46PM March 19, 2012

Birth control is elective!!! If other industrys are required to have such insurance than why not religous institutions? The church has nothing to worry about because people will follow there religous beliefs. Which means no birth control. Oh wait some church goers might disagree with that and not feel its an infrigement on there religous rights to take advantage of birth control. This isnt religous freedom no ones forcing people to take the birth control only offer it. This is people forcing there beliefs on others.

undisclosed 11:31AM March 08, 2012

When a religious organization makes the DECISION to become an employer, they must follow labor law. They do not get to choose what laws to follow.

The businesses that are not exempted because the are FOR PROFIT must follow the same labor laws as every other employer.

It is not unconstitutional. The SCOTUS has looked at this issue several times.

Churches, which are not for profit, don't have to follow the law.

It's pretty straight forward.

Amber of WA 2:17PM March 04, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement