• Comment (8)

Obama's Super PAC Reversal Is Cash Trumping Principle

February 7, 2012 RSS Feed Print

President Barack Obama has reversed course, deciding to embrace the so-called "super PACs" arising out of the U. S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision that he and his party have repeatedly denounced.

Super PACs can take unlimited amounts of money and do not have to disclose the identity of their donors but cannot coordinate their activities with official campaign organizations. They have already proven their effectiveness, helping former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney beat back a surging Newt Gingrich in both Iowa and Florida through a skillful but negative television ad campaign.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Are Super PACs Harming U.S. Politics?]

Liberals have attacked the super PACs as yet another opportunity for the corruption of the political system through the influx of money. Obama even went so far as to criticize the members of the nation's highest court to their face during his State of the Union address two years ago for the decision that allowed the creation of these new entities.

"With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections," Obama said during the speech. "I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people. And I'd urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to correct some of these problems."

[See a collection of political cartoons on Super PACs.]

Now, faced with GOP-aligned committees demonstrating they can have an impact on campaigns, Obama has apparently changed his mind. "We decided to do this because we can't afford for the work you're doing in your communities, and the grass-roots donations you give to support it, to be destroyed by hundreds of millions of dollars in negative ads," the president's re-election campaign manager Jim Messina told supporters in an E-mail Monday night according to Politico.

Apparently the requirements of the situation determine the proper course of behavior. Obama, who was the first major party presidential candidate to opt out of the federal campaign finance system since it was created in the aftermath of Watergate, has now decided he needs the money more than he needs to stick to principle.

Tags:
Barack Obama,
politics,
campaigns,
2012 presidential election

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

“All the President's Funny Money”

“Last week, the laggard watchdogs at the Federal Election Commission announced an audit of the Obama 2008 campaign committee -- which raised a record-setting $750 million. White House flacks are downplaying the probe as a "routine review."

“But there's nothing routine about the nearly $3 million Obama has spent on legal expenses to address federal campaign finance irregularities and inquiries. Roll Call reports that Obama's campaign legal fees have exceeded all other House and presidential campaign committees, including members of Congress under ethics investigations.”

“There's nothing routine about the whopping $6 million that Team Obama has refunded to individual donors since Obama took office.”

“And there's nothing routine about the 26 warning letters to Obama for America totaling "more than 1,500 pages of questions and data that outlined compliance concerns -- including the longest one ever sent to a presidential candidate, according to Roll Call.

Among the Obama 2008 campaign committee's shadiest transactions that have gone unpunished":

-- "Foreign funny money. Federal election law bans foreign nationals from contributing to American candidates. But during 2008, the Obama campaign was forced to return an illegal foreign donation worth $31,100 made by two brothers in the Gaza Strip, and even mainstream news outlets reported that candidate Obama's money-handlers had routinely failed to verify citizenship by checking donors' passports. As the Associated Press reported at the time: "One donor, Tom Sanderson of Canada, made clear his $500 contribution came from a foreign source. He included a note that said, 'I am not an American citizen!' Obama's campaign took the money anyway..."

"Another illegal foreign donor, Australian Richard Watters, contributed $1,000, "entering a fake U.S. passport number -- a random jumble of numbers and letters" onto the Obama donation website. "He said he also checked a box stating that he was an American living overseas, 'because I could see it wasn't going anywhere if I didn't do that.'"

"Obama raked in at least $2 million in overseas donations."

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=43070

Bill Hedges of MO 5:44AM February 08, 2012

all the president is doing is leveling the playing field. he didn;t make the rules. to not take super pac money would be like bring a knife to a gun fight.

bruce b of NV 11:22PM February 07, 2012

So, you seriously expect Obama to wage his re-election campaign with the equivalent of one arm tied behind his back? The Republicans applauded the SCOTUS decision that led to this; you should not whine when this weapon is also used against you.

Scott of MN 10:59PM February 07, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement