• Comment (2)

Barack Obama: Polarizer-in-Chief

January 31, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Barack Obama won the White House in a landslide in 2008, posting the most convincing win of any Democrat since Lyndon Johnson in 1964. By promising "hope" and "change," he garnered more than 69 million votes, winning just under 53 percent of the popular vote and 365 votes in the electoral college.

He did it by campaigning as a post-partisan centrist, tapping into the resentment many Americans felt against the party in power over issues ranging from the war in Iraq to the Wall Street bailout. His manner of governing, however, has been a far cry from the kind of president he promised to be.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

Beginning with the earliest days of his administration, Obama has come across as a man who doesn't care to listen to the people with whom he disagrees. From his dismissal of GOP congressional critics because "I won" to his walking away from Arizona GOP Gov. Jan Brewer in the middle of a conversation at Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport, the president shows little tolerance for those who think differently about the way the nation should be governed. To put it bluntly, the president is a polarizing figure, something that is reflected in the latest Gallup Poll released Friday. Democrats love him, and Republicans? Well, not so much.

According to Gallup, "the historically high gap" between what Republicans and Democrats think of Obama has existed for most of his tenure in office. "In fact, Obama's Year Three average 68-percentage-point partisan gap is tied for the fourth highest" the venerable polling firm has recorded, going back to the Eisenhower administration—and little surprise, as 80 percent of Democrats and only 12 percent of Republicans approve of the job he is doing as president.

[Vote now: Will Obama be a one-term president?]

Some, especially those who say George W. Bush was also a polarizing president, say the numbers are consistent with divisions that dominate the political life of the nation and are not an indictment of the current president. Others suggest that Obama's numbers are a reflection of his own presidency, of the way in which he himself has sought to polarize the country. That he sees the country as a collection of opposing interest groups—like the 99 percent vs. the 1 percent, or labor vs. management, or the rich vs. the middle class—is evident from his rhetoric on the stump.

As he prepares to campaign in earnest for a second term, it is clear that he and his campaign team want a "base election," one in which the two major party candidates battle it out to see who can deliver the most reliable supporters to the polls. Such a campaign leaves little room for casual voters, disaffected members of either party, and self-described independents—all of whom want to vote "for" something rather than cast a ballot "against" someone. It's the strategy that George W. Bush successfully employed to defeat Sen. John Kerry in the 2004 election.

[See a photo gallery of Bush's legacy.]

But it's a strategy that has costs. It is difficult to come out of a base election claiming much of a mandate, something Bush found out as he tried to introduce new initiatives in his second term that required a mass consensus to get them through Congress. Instead, as the polarization increased, his party lost control of Congress just two years later—although not exclusively for reasons tied to the president's agenda.

Obama will not, it appears, be able to bring America together in the next campaign which means he has to come up with an entirely new strategy for victory. Whether he can and still win re-election depends on whether America remains a center-right country, as many political observers believe it to still be. Running to the left could hurt Obama in November. Unfortunately, it's the only place he has to go.

Tags:
George W. Bush,
Obama administration,
2012 presidential election

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"Barack Obama: Polarizer-in-Chief"

No.... really?

Obama sat in a black, racist, Afrocentrist "church" and listened to the Reverend Wright spew, "God Damn America.", " It's time to take the power from whitey" and "White America is the U.S. of KKK. Wright and Louis Farrakahn - the Mohamed of the Black Muslims - are good buddies and they both preach hate for whites and Jews.

Now, take a deep breath and come to the realization that our president sat in that racist church for more than 20 years. Is it any wonder that Michelle said, she was never proud to be an American until her husband ran for president and that she felt that, "America has always been a hateful place".

When he was stumping in California and speaking to Left Coast Liberals, unaware he was being recorded, the real Obama leaked out.

"You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest (read white folks), the jobs have been gone now for 25 years (yeah the enviros closed down the factories and mines) and nothing's replaced them,... And it's not surprising then they ( conservative white folks) get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them (racists) or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

You're right about one thing Barack, we are frustrated - with you and all Green-Socialists.

I make that observation that, If a white man ran for president with Obama's lack of experience and history (hung out with racists, terrorists and Marxists) the white guy would have been condemned by every news organization and politician in the country (and rightly so) - before he was run out of town covered in tar and feathers.

Obama skated through it all with a verbal tap dance, Greek Columns, fireworks and bumper sticker slogans. He couldn't lose - the doe-eyed Progressives and facile college kids would have voted for any liberal black with a slick patter - or even Che Guevara if they could have arranged a Frankenstein number on him.

Yeah - I guess you could say that BHO is really polarizing.

Anyone but Obama.... pleeeeeze!

R.L. Schaefer of CA 4:06PM February 01, 2012

When Omammy go on the TV and said he have an intese hatred of white people he set the statge for the 2nd civil war

Mark Holly of TX 6:11AM February 01, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement