• Comment (7)

America Needs New Ideas for Entitlements and Old Age

January 3, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Just how old is old?

According to a recent survey conducted by the Marist Institute for Public Opinion on behalf of Home Instead Senior Care, there is no single definition. The youngest of those surveyed old age starts around age 62. Generation X said 71. The "Baby Boomers" said 77. And "The Greatest Generation" said 81.

It's an important question, and not just where quality of life issues are concerned. Some of the largest federal entitlement programs—like Social Security and Medicare—go toward ameliorating a lot of the cost of getting old. Unfortunately current projections indicate that it will not be all that long before the demands on those programs outstrip the economy's ability to pay for them, at least as they are currently structured.

[Read Mort Zuckerman: Social Security Has Reached a Tipping Point]

The time to think about ways to reform these programs is long past. It's not enough to raise taxes or reduce benefits or raise the retirement age for Social Security and the inevitable rationing of the services available under Medicare is not going to go over very well either. America needs to come to terms now with the fact that people on average are going to live longer, want to live longer, and want to live well. "Being 'old' doesn't dampen the desire for a long life," Marist said, with survey respondents from every generation indicating they "all would like to live a long life to 90 years."

The ongoing revolution in healthcare could make this a reality—even if the current average U.S. life expectancy is only 78.4 years. But with longer lives come new medical realities and relatively new diseases like Alzheimer's that threaten to impose huge costs on the economy. Obamacare alone—or anything like it—isn't sufficient to address these problems. Healthcare consumers need more choices, not less, and they need to be empowered to make them.

The medical and pharmaceutical communities need to be looking for cures, not just better ways of treating the illnesses of an aging population, and the government needs to be their partner in the laboratories in this effort rather than being a bureaucratic watchdog keeping new treatments from entering the medical marketplace.

[See a collection of political cartoons on healthcare.]

America's aging population needs to have more choices when it comes to planning for retirement, which means allowing for private accounts as a part of Social Security instead of continuing the one-size-doesn't-fit-all system that is nearing bankruptcy.

It's up to Congress and the president to address these problems now, while there's still time. Kicking the can down the road means handing an enormous bill to our children and grandchildren, above and beyond what's already coming their way.

Tags:
social security,
healthcare,
Medicare

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The only way to fix this except for massive tax increases is to end eliminate entitlements for everyone over 80 (no exceptions) and open parlors where they can choose to end their life with a little dignity like in Soylent Green. Not a bad way to go. You can get the program rolling by guaranteeing ten years of continued entitlements to everyone regardless of current age. It's an immediate end to the problem. We can send 18 year olds off to die for oil but we can't put old people into a position where after a very long life, they can't give something back??

Hoodoo of TX 3:00PM March 11, 2012

A lot of variables here, mostly how long you're going to live. I've seen varying data on this.

http://livingstingy.blogspot.com/2011/07/do-you-pay-more-into-social-security.html

Thank you Mr. Hedges for the response.

Still want a Fraud Reform Bill. Might as well fix what we can. That should be easily bi-partisan.

Bobarooni of ID 6:23PM January 04, 2012

Bobarooni of ID _ Nothin “Ironic” about it. Retiree like myself EARNED our SS & medicare.

As I recall Ross P. made hs money selling his computer system to s/s. Newt has suggest new computer programs throughout government saying would save in the $$$ T. No doubt there is fraud.

Social Security and Medicare was paid for by my payments, employer matching, and 40 + years of interest that should have happened:

“Will You Get Back Your Social Security Taxes in Retirement”

“Consider a single man who earns the average wage throughout his career ($43,100 in 2010 dollars), works every year from age 22 to 64, and then retires at age 65 in 2010. Over his lifetime he has paid $345,000 into the system. But he is likely to get back $72,000 more than that, or $417,000 in Social Security and Medicare payouts, according to recent Urban Institute calculations.”

Problem with this is my employer matched me. Instead of $345,000 is $690,000. Problem with that no interest. Safe to say it will double to $1,380,000

http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/planning-to-retire/2011/01/06/will-you-get-back-your-social-security-taxes-in-retirement

Bill Hedges of MO 10:22PM January 03, 2012

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement