• Comment (18)

Poll: Independent Women Are Key to a 2012 GOP Victory

December 16, 2011 RSS Feed Print

It's beginning to look very much like independent voters will determine the outcome of the 2012 election, just like they did in 2008 and 2010.

This is not good news for President Barack Obama or for the Democrats who, despite the fact that the GOP controls the U.S. House of Representatives, are perceived by most voters as being the party in power. Which, to be blunt, has made a hash of just about everything.

[Check out editorial cartoons about the Democratic Party.]

Unemployment is up. The economic recovery is the slowest and longest in post-war history. If the 1992 election—the last time an incumbent president was tossed out by the voters—was about "the economy, stupid," then 2012 will be, even more to the point, about "jobs, jobs, jobs." This is already showing up in the polls, which show independents still fleeing the country's top Democrat in droves—an early "tell" about how 2010 was going to turn out—and Obama running behind, in some cases decidedly so, against his potential opponents and against "generic Republican" in the critical swing states that will decide the election.

[See Mort Zuckerman's five sure-fire ways to create jobs.]

How these independents are thinking is the subject of a new survey by Resurgent Republic, the polling operation founded by former Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie. To put it plainly, Resurgent Republic says, "Conservatives have the upper hand with these voters for now, and the party best able to appeal to Independents in 2012 will win the White House and may well claim both chambers of Congress."

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

The greatest potential for the GOP to "grow the vote" comes, the group says, from its ability to appeal to independent women.

Independent women are less conservative (34 percent) than Independent men (44 percent), and currently favor Republicans by smaller margins than men on the presidential ballot (42 to 35 percent versus 44 to 29 percent) and the generic congressional ballot (34 to 32 percent versus 38 to 26 percent among men).

By expanding its appeal to this critical cohort, the Republican Party may be able to sweep into office a new generation of leaders that will control the country's public policy machinery for some time to come.

It will not, however, be easy, no matter how friendly the terrain may be going into the election season. The issues will have be chosen carefully and presented in such a way that target audience will embrace rather than feel alienated by them.

[Find out about the women of the Senate.]

When making that case, they advise, the GOP should do a few things like keeping the discussion of entitlement reform focused on the future, emphasize heathcare reforms like allowing people to buy health insurance across state lines while continuing to pound on the unfairness of the individual mandate, and talk up an expansion of offshore drilling as the way toward energy independence rather than nuclear power,

"Conservatives can win among independent women by making the case that their approach to the economy and government spending will be more successful than President Obama's approach," RR reports, "considering these women overwhelmingly say things are worse now than when the President took office."

 

Tags:
Obama administration,
Republican Party,
2012 presidential election,
female voters,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

reubenr of NY

I give credit to Ind. women to do more than read article but also read the comments. To know you can't keep going into deeper in debt.

That it was Newt who balanced the budget following the CONTRACT WITH AMERICA. There is only one choice for President who came up with agreements from both Dems & Repubs. That would be Newt...

Bill Hedges of MO 10:57AM December 19, 2011

Basically, what you are saying is that the Republicans do not stand for anything in particular and can sculpt their platform in such a way to manipulate independent women to vote for them. I don't doubt for one moment that is how they operate but I give independent women more credit than this article seems to suggest they deserve.

reubenr of NY 8:33AM December 19, 2011

Olenka of WA & Citizen 1st of NV_ Newt worked in the system AND STILL accomplish much. That is the important difference between Newt & Paul. Thank you Olenka for proving my point. Is why I asked THAT QUESTION. Thank you very much. MADE MY DAY. We live in the REAL world. Not a fairy tale PEACE and LOVE one...

You can speak for yourself and that is all. Teddy Kennedy got re-elected time after time. I imagine if his brother had lived he to would have been given a second term. I ASSUME I need not repeat their history. So that point is MUTE.

You are certainly entitled to vote as you wish. Nearly everything good claimed by Bill C. did not exist before Newt & CONTRACT WITH AMERICA. Tax reduction with more government revenue than with Bill C. tax increase on rich, balance budget, and surplus all was Newt. Side issues welfare reform and last civil rights bill passed for adoption. Obuma went behind the backs of Congress using Fed. Reserve to loan $$$ trillions upon $$$ trillions to his campaign contributors in Wall Street and also foreign banks. Fannie and Freddie was given blank check and owes $$$ trillions more in debt and that is A VERY BIG CONCERN because likely will never be paid back. YOU want obama for another 4 years GOD HELP THIS COUNTRY if that happens. WE WILL be a third world Country for sure if not retrained like he is now. Interest on debt still will rise.

If you had read my comments, Paul's stance on PEACE is yours. Not according to polls. Paul is a distance 3rd generally Nationwide. Just as it is with Paul in Congress, he changes LITTLE. Same if President. This is his third try. He is known by his views. And not moving UPWARD in great strength. I can certainly be wrong for I never thought obuma would be elected. Maybe Paul will win one or two States. If so that would be hope for you. If not then not much hope. Time to back the bags.

For your thinking next choice is Huntmen. He is future down than line than Michael in polls. Afraid by polls you're NOT IN THE NORM ACCORDING TO POLLS. Off on NORM “common sense thinking” as you say.

You write of Newt “most ethically & morally challenged public figures in the past 30 yrs”.Ethic must be talking ethic committee. All charges were dropped except his teaching. That court ruled LEGAL. A few minor points he was found guilty and Newt so stated. Unlike Bill C. Newt did not lie. Bill C. lost his ability to practice law. While Newt deserves his $$$ 300,000 returned with interest for he was found innocent. No wrong doing in Fannie & Freddie payments to New. Have discussed divorce which most families are familiar with. Is common. Near all the elected Kennedy clan have “ethically & morally challenged public figures in the past 30 yrs”. Future back than thirty years. Two with SAME WOMAN.

Well Biden & H. Clinton was scared of obuma. Rightlyfully so. Newt in Congress has a magnificent record to be proud of, which I partially discussed.

You must not be familiar with polls. Obuma keeps dropping. Already worse president. Only thing lower than his approval record is is job approval ratings. Closer to vote time people think with their pocketbooks. Obuma passed 8 years of Bush debt LONG, LONG, AGO. More time golfing than Bush too.

You will have to provide your “demographic data”, then we can discuss.

Bill Hedges of MO 5:15AM December 19, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement