• Comment (6)

Obama Reducing Security at U.S.-Mexico Border

December 13, 2011 RSS Feed Print

There is a conspicuous lack of consensus between Republicans and Democrats—and for that matter liberals and conservatives—about what to do about illegal immigration. Some people support amnesty, others mass deportation, and most something that falls somewhere in between.

The one place where there is agreement, however, is on the need to secure the southern U.S. border. It's not just a matter of immigration, illegal or otherwise, but of combating criminal enterprises and ensuring national security. The porous U.S.-Mexican border is a haven for a host of nefarious undertakings including human trafficking, drug smuggling, and kidnapping. Some reports even suggest foreign nationals from countries decidedly unfriendly to the United States may have taken advantage of the situation to enter and leave the country undetected.

[Read the U.S. News debate on building a fence on the U.S.-Mexican border.]

To combat this problem President Barack Obama rightly mobilized the National Guard to assist the U.S. Border Patrol back in June of 2010. Now, pleading poverty, he's about to reverse course.

Obama, the Washington Times reports, intends—early next year—to "cut the number of National Guard troops patrolling the U.S.-Mexico border by at least half," this according to a member of the U.S. House of Representatives whose district shares a border with Mexico and who has been briefed on the plan. His justification for the reduction is budget cuts, the kind forced into place by the failure of the so-called congressional super committee to produce a package of spending restraint as part of a deal earlier this year that gave Obama the increase in the debt ceiling he so desperately wanted.

[Check out a roundup of editorial cartoons on immigration.]

It is beyond belief that the guy who increased the national debt by $4.2 trillion in just about two years is suddenly so concerned about spending that he would jeopardize U.S. border security over a few comparatively measly dollars. It's also doesn't ring true that his hands are so tied by the mandatory spending cuts that he couldn't find a way to come up with the money if he really wanted to. It may be that with all those guns lying around in the hands of the drug cartels thanks to Attorney General Eric Holder's "Operation Fast and Furious" that it's too dangerous to keep the guard on the border but somehow I doubt it.

Congress needs to take the lead if Obama won't and make sure the promised cuts don't go into effect.

Tags:
immigration reform,
national security terrorism and the military,
federal budget,
Obama administration

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Question: Is Obama an insipid fool, or a Benedict Arnold?? Anyone with an ounce of common sense knows the Mexican border has to be patrolled to protect the citizens - white, African-American, Hispanic, etc. - from the murderous drug lords. The President either is so ignorant he can't see what is going on, or he's trying to sell us out. Heck, Hillary Clinton recognizes Mexico is on the brink of collapsing due to "narco-insurgency." Where is Obama in all of this?

David of MO 12:47PM December 26, 2011

Mandate E-Verify For all businesses and enforce it...check all workers within 3 years.

Make if felony with a mandatory 6 month offense for first time entering illegally or overstaying a visa.

Pass HR 98 that would make SS cards secure.....

End Anchor babies by passing HR 140

Put in mandatory 6 months in jail for every employee owner hires knowingly.

George Fuller of FL 2:05PM December 14, 2011

Gene Hunt of TX

Writes “Yet, I suppose if we reduced spending for hungry children that would be okay.”

Yes and we are FOR dirty air, water, and I guess child porn correct Gene ?

Obuma thinks we ARE RICH loaning $$$ TRILLIONS to foreign banks. Just PRINT THE $$$ TRILLIONS THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCES ???!!! So what if they pay back 50 cent on the dollar. Is only paper mix.

National security is IMPORTANT. COST of illegals is HIGH. Harry Reid (D) says DON'T CUT COWBOY POET SOCIETY. Needed expense.

___

“Swing states poll: Romney, Gingrich lead Obama”

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/111213/swing-states-poll-romney-gingrich-lead-obama

Bill Hedges of MO 6:11PM December 13, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement