• Comment (9)

In Skipping Trump Debate, Romney Risks Alienating Conservatives

December 8, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Conservatives have an obvious problem with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

Despite being the anointed frontrunner for much of the campaign, Romney has not yet managed to consolidate his lead. In the polls he never manages to show the support of more than about a third of likely primary voters and caucus goers, suggesting there is some kind of a ceiling in place that he just can't break through. Whether conservatives don't trust him or simply don't like him, for some other reason he's having a tough time convincing them to back his presidential bid.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Mitt Romney]

Now that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has surged into the lead nationally and in Iowa, Romney is taking the gloves off. He's hitting Gingrich harder than in the past, but that won't necessarily help him with the party's conservative base, the folks who—more likely than not—are going to determine who gets to challenge President Barack Obama next November. In fact instead of building bridges to them it looks like he's going the other way.

Romney will be spending more time in Iowa in the coming weeks in an effort to generate support. However says he's going to skip the debate that Donald Trump is going to moderate that is being organized by Newsmax, a news magazine and website widely read by the conservative activists and politicos that are just the type of people Romney needs to convince he can be president.

[Read the U.S. News debate on whether Republican presidential candidates should participate in Donald Trump's debate.]

It's a small point but, some people are already saying, a telling one. Having participated in all the debates thus far—including the ones sponsored by the cable news and broadcast networks and the one backed by two major conservative think tanks, Romney is taking a pass on the one most likely to be of interest to the kind of conservatives who most need to be convinced that he has the stuff it takes to be the next president.

[Read Grover Norquist: Donald Trump and Newsmax Should Host a GOP Debate, Not MSNBC and CNN.]

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus has given Romney and the other Republicans who have elected not to participate cover by suggesting that having Trump as moderator while the New York billionaire is still considering an independent bid for the White House is not appropriate. Still, it is an opportunity to reach conservatives across the country—the debate will be aired on ION Television and simulcast over the Newsmax.com web site. By not participating, Romney is not only missing the chance to take his message directly to the people he most needs to hear it, he risks alienating them just a little bit at a time when he can ill afford to do so.

 

Tags:
conservatives,
politics,
Donald Trump,
2012 presidential election,
Newt Gingrich,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Bobbarooni of ID

Says “Reagan wouldn't have been able to either. That's how extreme the party has become”

Newt is a political look alike to Reagan. I see those comments, like yours, from those calling us “Extreme”. “EXTREME” is obuma loaning $$$ trillions to foreign banks behind the backs of Congress & THE PEOPLE. SHOULD NOT PLAY HIDE & SEEK LIKE THAT...

Bill Hedges of MO 11:21PM December 09, 2011

We have had 50 debates and Romney is going to suffer because he won't kowtow to blow hard Trump who has no constituency other than himself. I think not. Romney will have trouble with conservatives because Romney is a reasonable pragmatic. He won't pass the conservative purity test, but that's o.k., Reagan wouldn't have been able to either. That's how extreme the party has become.

Bobbarooni of ID 7:15PM December 09, 2011

At a time when job creation is one of the most important topics in the country, a number of us were actually looking forward to having a job creator/businessman asking questions pertinent to the subject.

This would have been an ideal opportunity for Romney to showcase what he would do to get America "working" again, particularly since he and Trump should speak the same language.

Instead Romney's response was that he'd already agreed to two debates in December? What's he going to do if something important comes up while he's in the White House, say "I'm sorry, that's not on my schedule?" We already have that in the White House, we don't need a "Republican" version of the Bystander in Chief.

Nathan of CA 2:19PM December 09, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement