• Comment (12)

2012 Should Be About Ideas, Not GOP Star Power

November 9, 2011 RSS Feed Print

By asking Americans to consider whether or not they were "better off than they were four years ago," Ronald Reagan deftly turned the 1980 election into a referendum on the Carter years.

People tend to forget, but up until the incumbent president and the former California governor faced off in their one and only debate, Carter held the lead in most of the national polls. Reagan used the debate and the question to turn the tide of the campaign, getting the voters to focus on Carter's mistakes and Carter's ineffectiveness in stemming the tide of bad economic and diplomatic news.

Fast forward to today when, despite a comparably bad economic picture and continued White House mismanagement of the economy, many Republicans continue to believe instinctively that Barack Obama is headed for a second term. They perceive the GOP field to be weak overall and do not believe the party's air war and ground game will be sufficient to compete against what the Democrats and their union allies will be able to do to get voters to the polls.

[Vote now: Will Obama be a one-term president?]

In politics such concerns are reasonable, but concerns do not determine outcomes; actions do. The GOP's continued fascination with who among their number is the most electable is a formula for defeat. It sets up a race that tries to match star power against star power—and Barack Obama wins that fight. Should the Republicans start to focus on who has the best ideas on how to win the future and improve America, which is what the Carter-Reagan contest of 1980 actually ended up being about—then they may feel their fortunes and their spirits rise.

They would also do well to examine the latest poll from Resurgent Republic, the survey operation run by a group of high-level GOPers including former RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie, which finds that "70 percent of voters say the country is on the wrong track," the highest that critical number has been since they first started polling in April 2009.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

According to the survey, voters believe the country is worse off since Obama took office. Here are just a few key findings from the poll:

  • Compared to January 2009, voters say the following things are worse: the federal government's financial situation (67 percent), the economy (61 percent), the federal government's ability to solve problems (60 percent), and America's standing in the world (50 percent).
  • Obama remains upside down among independents. These voters disapprove of his overall job performance, 53 to 43 percent, and his handling of the economy, 62 to 35 percent.
  • By 53 to 37 percent, independents believe Obama is more interested in "campaigning against Republicans in Congress to win re-election" than "working with Republicans to get things done."
  • Obama's re-election numbers are stuck in the low 40s:
  • 42 percent say Obama deserves re-election (33 percent of independents and 28 percent of swing state independents).
  • 42 percent support Obama on the generic ballot (32 percent of independents and 27 percent of swing state independents).

Apparently, America already believes it is less well off than it was four years ago when Obama came into office. What the GOP has to do now—and it has a year in which to do it—is find a way to tap in to that sentiment in a manner that makes the electoral math work to its advantage. Whether or not it will remains an open question.

Tags:
Obama administration,
Republican Party,
2012 presidential election

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

thebob.bob of GA

Yes voters are tired of obama. Remember Nov. 2, 2010. Check about any poll on barry. Check out our wins in recent elections. We are stronger.

Maybe you missed the Messiah's job plan thrown into the dirt by 100% of a committee ? This group came up with their own job bill discarding 'the chosen one' PORK and bad plan. No PORK in new bill. Committee voted 100 % for new bill.

No-need-for-barry...

Bill Hedges of MO 11:55AM November 10, 2011

brucetee

S/S was not meant to be full income at retirement. I have that, a work retirement, and savings that I invest in stock market in better times.

It use to be 40 plus working to every S/S retiree. That number to retiree is shrinking daily thanks to baby boomers.

"Social Security is a “pay-as-you-go” program, which means that today’s workers are paying for the benefits to today’s beneficiaries through their payroll taxes. In 1940, there were 42 workers per retiree. In 1950, the ratio was 16-to-1. Today, there are 3.3 workers per retiree, and within 40 years, it’s projected that there will be just two workers per retiree. At the present rate, as the population ages and life expectancies continue to rise, the system will not be able to sustain itself into the future without major reform."

http://www3.prudential.com/signature/Social-Security.html

This is why CHANGE MUST HAPPEN.

If S/S accounts had not been raided there would be no problem. Article provided shows employee share for S/S was matched by employer. Add say 40 years of interest and you have no problem.

Instead my S/S check is paid out of workers today contributions.

I keep harping on the few Counties in Texas private S/S, ones existing before loopholes were closed. They had no Congress stealing S/S principal. How they can afford to pay out more with same contributions.

At "3.3 workers per retiree" S/S is doomed to fail. When is the question. That is predicated on how much principle exist if any. I believe Newt in recent debate gave out our true debt is $$$ 100 trillion considering entitlements. Newt does not throw out numbers.

"The Conservative Case For Newt Gingrich"

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2011/11/01/the_conservative_case_for_newt_gingrich/page/full/

OR "[PDF] Entitlements and the Federal Budget - Cato Institute"

I left out Newt's site.

Bill Hedges of MO 11:39AM November 10, 2011

In Wisconsin , two Republican representatives where recalled for the first time in history. Now in Arizona, another ultra Conservative is thrown out. In Ohio, even with Mitt Romney's 110% endorsement flip-flop, voters threw out punitive anti-Union legislation.

Republicans invented, financed and magnified the extreme rightwing TEA party. They presented it as proof that America had turned against a demon (Obama) of their own making. Well, reality bites.

Americans are tired of the phony outrage, the lack of patriotic coming together to solve our problems, the endless anti-government, anti-union, anti-tax, anti-women, anti-immigrant anti-voter fear, hatred and division that Republicans subject us too.

Enough!

thebob.bob of GA 10:57AM November 10, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement