• Comment (19)

Herman Cain Sexual Harassment Charge Shows He's Legitimate

October 31, 2011 RSS Feed Print

If anyone needed proof that Herman Cain had become a legitimate contender for the 2012 presidential nomination, the story that broke over the weekend in Politico--that he had been accused of sexual harassment when he headed the National Restaurant Association--is it.

It’s the politics of personal destruction all over again. Someone who would rather not see Cain as the GOP nominee—or who just wants to keep the GOP field in disarray—has injected a highly volatile, potentially campaign and career-ending allegation into the race that has already forced the arguable Republican front-runner onto the defensive.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the GOP hopefuls.]

The campaign is firing back and, surprisingly, may be able to withstand the charge in today’s changing political climate.

Cain chief of staff Mark Block told NBC Monday that "Herman Cain has never sexually harassed anybody, period. End of story. The only people who spoke publicly about the story in that article are the ones that were in the best position to know."

"They were the chair, vice chair and immediate past chair of the National Restaurant Association during Herman Cain's tenure," Block went on.  "Yet all three—and all three said that he was a man of total integrity. Every negative word and accusation in the article is sourced to a series of unnamed or anonymous sources, and this is questionable at best. I am not personally aware of any cash settlement relating to sexual harassment charges to Mr. Cain."

The public is sick to death of so-called "gotcha" stories that are short on fact but long on rumor, innuendo, and anonymous sources. The media, should it keep trying to drive this train, may end up feeling more of the heat—unless they can come up with some specific facts and find some people who are willing to put their name to an allegation—than the Cain campaign, whose supporters will likely take this latest attack as confirmation that their man is a serious candidate for president.

[8 Politicos Who Survived Scandals]

The mainstream media’s record on issues like this is spotty, to put it mildly, and they have a lot to answer for. They followed the Democratic Party line from Gennifer Flowers to Paula Jones to Monica Lewinsky and beyond in an effort to help President Bill Clinton and, had it not been for Matt Drudge, they would have gotten away with it. They also did everything they could to bury the Sen. John Edwards "love child" story until the National Enquirer made it impossible to ignore. So how come Herman Cain is suddenly fair game, especially with a story as apparently thin and anonymously sourced as the one that appeared over the weekend?

It may be that there is more to the story but that’s doubtful. The story and its timing smacks of political tactics, the kind that derail campaigns at critical moments because the charges sound bad, the reality is difficult to explain and, most of all, because the sizzle is more interesting than the steak.

Tags:
Herman Cain,
media,
2012 presidential election,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I thank the author of the story above for recognizing the difference between a news story and political ads.

If campaign reformers are concerned about reducing the influence of corporate special interests in American politics, why are the commercial media, themselves special interests and dependent on the advertising dollars of other special interests, exempt from campaign laws that regulate citizens, citizens groups, candidates and political parties.

How does giving a megaphone to the corporate media while muzzling communications by 'we the people' reduce corporate influence? The corporate media is free to spike or ignore stories and decide what views are presented as news. The corporate media are the biggest promoters of campaign reform because it concentrates the power of their voice.

2 USC 431 (9) (B) (i) The term "expenditure" does not include any news story, commentary, or editorial distributed through the facilities of any broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publication, unless such facilities are owned or controlled by any political party, political committee, or candidate;

Individuals and grass roots organizations have formed 527 and 501(c)(4) corporations to get around some, not all, of the regulations that hinder participation by flesh and blood persons.

The commercial press exemption not only denies flesh and blood persons equal protection of the law, it also denies different types of corporations’ equal protection of the law.

To restore the 'equal rights' of flesh and blood persons the language of the press exemption, above, should be modified to read: “The term expenditure does not include any news story, commentary, or editorial distributed by any citizen, citizens group, broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publication.”

BenDoubleCrossed of FL 12:05PM November 02, 2011

If Herman Cain is finished, then why did he raise between $250,000 and $400,000 on Monday?! That's something odd to me. Please explain his fund-raising and thank you, yet no offense to my opponents.

C.P. of MA 12:04PM November 02, 2011

brucetee

McCain shut your liberal tongues quickly by showing his birth certificate and health records.

Don't talk about polls when you can not provide the link. Don't trust your words since you said Newt was booted out of House. Not my problem you can't find the link. My grand daughter can look up information and she is only 12...

Bill Hedges of MO 6:03AM November 02, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement